IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v32y2015i6p616-628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of the Structured Interview Matrix to Enhance Community Resilience Through Collaboration and Inclusive Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Tracey L. O'Sullivan
  • Wayne Corneil
  • Craig E. Kuziemsky
  • Darene Toal‐Sullivan

Abstract

The EnRiCH Project was formed to address challenges with disaster management for high risk populations. The theoretical foundation is based on salutogenesis, systems theory and community resilience, with emphasis on community assets, social capital, citizen participation, and collaborative practice, which support adaptive capacity to respond and recover from adverse events. We present results from the process evaluation of the use of the structured interview matrix (SIM) facilitation technique as a first step in asset‐mapping for a community resilience intervention. Nine SIM sessions were conducted across five geographic communities (n = 143) with professionals and volunteers from emergency management, health and social services, community organisations and citizens who represent high risk populations. Open‐ended questionnaires were completed by (n = 139) participants to document experiences of partaking in the session. Content analysis suggests that the SIM is an effective technique to enhance connectedness, common ground, collaborative action, and awareness of existing services and supports in each community. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Tracey L. O'Sullivan & Wayne Corneil & Craig E. Kuziemsky & Darene Toal‐Sullivan, 2015. "Use of the Structured Interview Matrix to Enhance Community Resilience Through Collaboration and Inclusive Engagement," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 616-628, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:32:y:2015:i:6:p:616-628
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2250
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shannon Tracey & Tracey L. O’Sullivan & Daniel E. Lane & Emily Guy & Jill Courtemanche, 2017. "Promoting Resilience Using an Asset-Based Approach to Business Continuity Planning," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, May.
    2. Valentine Seymour & Mike King & Roberta Antonaci, 2020. "Exploring those characteristics which may help to foster and support people’s social-ecological resilience: an environmental volunteering case study," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(4), pages 438-456, December.
    3. Ayyoob Sharifi & Lorenzo Chelleri & Cate Fox-Lent & Stelios Grafakos & Minal Pathak & Marta Olazabal & Susie Moloney & Lily Yumagulova & Yoshiki Yamagata, 2017. "Conceptualizing Dimensions and Characteristics of Urban Resilience: Insights from a Co-Design Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Maraña, Patricia & Labaka, Leire & Sarriegi, Jose Mari, 2020. "We need them all: development of a public private people partnership to support a city resilience building process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Tiko Iyamu & Olayele Adelakun, 2021. "A global virtual team model to improve software development collaboration project," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 937-956, September.
    6. Marta Iturriza & Josune Hernantes & Ahmed A. Abdelgawad & Leire Labaka, 2020. "Are Cities Aware Enough? A Framework for Developing City Awareness to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:32:y:2015:i:6:p:616-628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.