IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v32y2015i3p344-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systemic Approach to Multi-agency Community Safety

Author

Listed:
  • Mark John Taylor
  • Emma Higgins
  • Hulya Francis

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark John Taylor & Emma Higgins & Hulya Francis, 2015. "A Systemic Approach to Multi-agency Community Safety," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 344-357, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:32:y:2015:i:3:p:344-357
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/sres.2248
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark John Taylor & Emma Higgins & Mike Francis & Paulo Lisboa, 2011. "Managing unintentional dwelling fire risk," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(10), pages 1207-1218, November.
    2. Ann Bostrom, 2008. "Lead is like mercury: risk comparisons, analogies and mental models1," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1-2), pages 99-117, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emma Dean & Mark J. Taylor & Hulya Francis & Paulo Lisboa & Debbie Appleton & Mark Jones, 2017. "A Methodological Framework for Geographic Information Systems Development," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 759-772, November.
    2. Bruine de Bruin, Wändi & Carman, Katherine G. & Parker, Andrew M., 2021. "Mental associations with COVID-19 and how they relate with self-reported protective behaviors: A national survey in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Ann Bostrom & Ragnar E. Löfstedt, 2010. "Nanotechnology Risk Communication Past and Prologue," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(11), pages 1645-1662, November.
    4. Sophie Guy & Yoshihisa Kashima & Iain Walker & Saffron O’Neill, 2013. "Comparing the atmosphere to a bathtub: effectiveness of analogy for reasoning about accumulation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(4), pages 579-594, December.
    5. Heather Lazrus & Rebecca E. Morss & Julie L. Demuth & Jeffrey K. Lazo & Ann Bostrom, 2016. "“Know What to Do If You Encounter a Flash Flood”: Mental Models Analysis for Improving Flash Flood Risk Communication and Public Decision Making," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 411-427, February.
    6. Guldåker, Nicklas & Hallin, Per-Olof & Klubien, Mona Tykesson & Nilsson, Jerry, 2021. "Residential Fires in Metropolitan Areas - Living Conditions and Fire Prevention," OSF Preprints bghpx, Center for Open Science.
    7. Whitney Fleming & Adam L. Hayes & Katherine M. Crosman & Ann Bostrom, 2021. "Indiscriminate, Irrelevant, and Sometimes Wrong: Causal Misconceptions about Climate Change," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 157-178, January.
    8. Rebecca Hess & Vivianne H.M. Visschers & Michael Siegrist & Carmen Keller, 2011. "How do people perceive graphical risk communication? The role of subjective numeracy," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 47-61, January.
    9. Maurie Cohen, 2011. "Is the UK preparing for “war”? Military metaphors, personal carbon allowances, and consumption rationing in historical perspective," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 199-222, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:32:y:2015:i:3:p:344-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.