IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i3p843-861.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public sector corruption is fertile ground for conspiracy beliefs: A comparison between 26 Western and non‐Western countries

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent Cordonier
  • Florian Cafiero

Abstract

Objective Research on conspiracy theories has mainly focused on psychosocial and sociodemographic factors associated with conspiracy beliefs. Little is known about factors at the nation level that provide a breeding ground for conspiracist thinking. However, an interesting finding emerges from recent international comparisons: people living in countries with a highly corrupt public sector seem to be more likely to endorse conspiracy theories. The present study aims to replicate this finding with new data. Methods We investigate the relationship between corruption and conspiracy beliefs across 26 Western and non‐Western countries through multiple linear regression analyses and conditional inference trees. In addition to the corruption level of these countries, our statistical models include other nation‐level factors known to be associated with the prevalence of conspiracy beliefs, namely, their levels of democracy, freedom of the press, social threat (unemployment and homicide rates), economic inequality, and human development (life expectancy, standard of living, and education). Results Our analyses confirm a robust link between public sector corruption and conspiracy beliefs that remains significant when controlling for these other factors. Conclusion We suggest that public sector corruption is fertile ground for conspiracy theories because it makes them less implausible to the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent Cordonier & Florian Cafiero, 2024. "Public sector corruption is fertile ground for conspiracy beliefs: A comparison between 26 Western and non‐Western countries," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(3), pages 843-861, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:3:p:843-861
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13374
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam M. Enders & Steven M. Smallpage, 2019. "Who Are Conspiracy Theorists? A Comprehensive Approach to Explaining Conspiracy Beliefs," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 100(6), pages 2017-2032, October.
    2. Moreno Mancosu & Salvatore Vassallo & Cristiano Vezzoni, 2017. "Believing in Conspiracy Theories: Evidence from an Exploratory Analysis of Italian Survey Data," South European Society and Politics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 327-344, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ștefan Boncu & Oara Prundeanu & Andrei Corneliu Holman & Simona Andreea Popușoi, 2022. "Believing in or Denying Climate Change for Questionable Reasons: Generic Conspiracist Beliefs, Personality, and Climate Change Perceptions of Romanian University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Nefes, Türkay Salim & Präg, Patrick & Romero-Reche, Alejandro & Pereira-Puga, Manuel, 2023. "Believing in conspiracy theories in Spain during the COVID-19 pandemic: Drivers and public health implications," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    3. Riccardo Ladini & Nicola Maggini, 2023. "The role of party preferences in explaining acceptance of freedom restrictions in a pandemic context: the Italian case," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 99-123, April.
    4. Fernando C. Gaspar, 2021. "Conspiracy Theories And Marketing: Lessons For Startups?," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 15(1), pages 313-322.
    5. Samuel Stroope & Rhiannon A. Kroeger & Courtney E. Williams & Joseph O. Baker, 2021. "Sociodemographic correlates of vaccine hesitancy in the United States and the mediating role of beliefs about governmental conspiracies," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2472-2481, November.
    6. Türkay Salim Nefes & Jasna MiloÅ¡ević Ä orÄ‘ević & Milica Vdović, 2024. "With God We Distrust! The Impact of Values in Conspiracy Theory Beliefs About Migration in Serbia," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(4), pages 931-946, December.
    7. Flaherty, Eoin & Sturm, Tristan & Farries, Elizabeth, 2022. "The conspiracy of Covid-19 and 5G: Spatial analysis fallacies in the age of data democratization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    8. Seoyong Kim & Sunhee Kim, 2020. "Searching for General Model of Conspiracy Theories and Its Implication for Public Health Policy: Analysis of the Impacts of Political, Psychological, Structural Factors on Conspiracy Beliefs about the," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-28, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:3:p:843-861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.