IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i3p817-831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizens’ perceptions of the quality of democracy in the American states

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Flavin
  • Gregory Shufeldt

Abstract

Objective We examine the relationship between citizens’ evaluations of democratic performance in their state of residence and demographic, political, and institutional factors. Methods We fielded two original surveys (summer 2021 and summer 2022) that asked respondents to evaluate democratic performance in their state both in general and for specific metrics. Results Citizens who identify with the political party that controls state government have more positive evaluations of state democratic performance while Republicans (controlling for a litany of covariates) have more negative evaluations. Strikingly, citizens’ perceptions are not related to an objective measure of state democratic performance even when they are primed with information about where their state ranks in a survey experiment. Conclusion Citizens’ assessments of democratic quality appear to be yet another feature of American politics that has become politicized and polarized, with important implications for system support and legitimacy going forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Flavin & Gregory Shufeldt, 2024. "Citizens’ perceptions of the quality of democracy in the American states," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(3), pages 817-831, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:3:p:817-831
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13359
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:3:p:817-831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.