IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v26y1999i1p87-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logspline Density Estimation under Censoring and Truncation

Author

Listed:
  • Ja‐Yong Koo
  • Charles Kooperberg
  • Jinho Park

Abstract

ABSTRACT. In this paper we consider logspline density estimation for data that may be left‐truncated or right‐censored. For randomly left‐truncated and right‐censored data the product‐limit estimator is known to be a consistent estimator of the survivor function, having a faster rate of convergence than many density estimators. The product‐limit estimator and B‐splines are used to construct the logspline density estimate for possibly censored or truncated data. Rates of convergence are established when the log‐density function is assumed to be in a Besov space. An algorithm involving a procedure similar to maximum likelihood, stepwise knot addition, and stepwise knot deletion is proposed for the estimation of the density function based upon sample data. Numerical examples are used to show the finite‐sample performance of inference based on the logspline density estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ja‐Yong Koo & Charles Kooperberg & Jinho Park, 1999. "Logspline Density Estimation under Censoring and Truncation," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 26(1), pages 87-105, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:26:y:1999:i:1:p:87-105
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9469.00139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9469.00139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9469.00139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrick Marsh, "undated". "Nonparametric Likelihood Ratio Tests," Discussion Papers 00/56, Department of Economics, University of York.
    2. Christian Schellhase & Göran Kauermann, 2012. "Density estimation and comparison with a penalized mixture approach," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 757-777, December.
    3. Bak, Kwan-Young & Jhong, Jae-Hwan & Lee, JungJun & Shin, Jae-Kyung & Koo, Ja-Yong, 2021. "Penalized logspline density estimation using total variation penalty," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:26:y:1999:i:1:p:87-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.