IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rgscpp/v15y2023i1p200-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shifting attitudes towards identity, borders and geopolitical choices: The case of Moldova

Author

Listed:
  • Loredana Maria Simionov

Abstract

The ongoing war at the immediate borders of the European Union (EU) poses the greatest security risk Europe has known since the end of the Second World War. Although the entire continent is on high alert, the proximity to the conflict is definitely an important factor to consider when assessing security risks. In this regard, not only is Moldova at Ukraine’s border, but its recent history (especially the frozen conflict in Transnistria) and the complicated relations with Russia, add to enhancing people’s fears and uncertainty. Moreover, the closed cultural, historical and ethnic ties that Moldova shares with Romania – a NATO and EU member – often fuel Russia’s threat perceptions to its Transistrian proxy. Within this context, this paper aims to assess the attitudes that Moldovans – a population that is traditionally divided between West and East, between EU (respectively Romania) and Russia – display towards their own identity and the path that their country should embrace in this difficult geopolitical design through mixed methods research. The main findings indicate a clear shift in Moldovans’ attitudes towards a stronger alignment with European integration that is also reflected in the preference regarding their country’s future geopolitical path. La guerra en curso en las fronteras inmediatas de la Unión Europea (UE) supone el mayor riesgo para la seguridad que Europa ha conocido desde el final de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Aunque todo el continente está en alerta máxima, la proximidad del conflicto es sin duda un factor importante a tener en cuenta a la hora de evaluar los riesgos para la seguridad. En este sentido, Moldavia no sólo comparte frontera con Ucrania, sino que su historia reciente (especialmente el arraigado conflicto del Transnistria) y las complicadas relaciones con Rusia, contribuyen a aumentar los temores y la incertidumbre de la población. Además, los estrechos lazos culturales, históricos y étnicos que Moldavia comparte con Rumanía, un miembro de la OTAN y de la UE, alimentan a menudo la percepción de amenaza de Rusia hacia su acólito en Transnistria. En este contexto, el presente artículo trata de evaluar las actitudes que la población moldava, tradicionalmente dividida entre Occidente y Oriente, entre la UE (respectivamente Rumanía) y Rusia, muestra hacia su propia identidad y el camino que su país debe escoger en este difícil diseño geopolítico a través de una investigación con métodos mixtos. Los principales hallazgos indican un claro cambio en las actitudes de la población moldava hacia una mayor alineación con la integración europea que también se refleja en la preferencia sobre la futura trayectoria geopolítica de su país. 欧州連合(EU)に直に接する国境で進行している戦争は、第2次世界大戦後の欧州が経験した中でも安全保障上の最大のリスクをもたらしている。大陸全体が厳戒態勢にあるが、紛争との近接性は、安全保障上のリスクを評価する際に考慮すべき重要な要素であることは間違いない。この点で、モルドバがウクライナの国境にあるだけでなく、最近の歴史(特に沿ドニエストル地域の凍結された紛争)やロシアとの複雑な関係も、人々の恐怖と不安を増大させている。さらには、モルドバがNATOおよびEU加盟国であるルーマニアと文化的、歴史的、民族的に緊密な関係にあることは、ロシアの代理ともいえる沿ドニエストル地域に対して脅威として認識されることを煽るものである。こうした背景の中で、本稿は、伝統的に西と東、EU(それぞれルーマニア)とロシアに分断されて居住しているモルドバ人の自身のアイデンティティに対する考えと、このような困難な地政学的状況の中で彼らの国が進むべき道を、様々な手法を組み合わせた研究によって評価することを目的としている。主な結果から、欧州統合とのより強固な連携に対するモルドバ人の姿勢が明らかに変化していることが示されており、これはモルドバが将来進むべき地政学的な方向に関する好みにも反映されている。

Suggested Citation

  • Loredana Maria Simionov, 2023. "Shifting attitudes towards identity, borders and geopolitical choices: The case of Moldova," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 200-221, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:200-221
    DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12613
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rsp3.12613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Székely & Balázs Kotosz, 2018. "From fence to wall? Changes in the mental space of border zones in Eastern Europe," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(4), pages 269-282, November.
    2. Loredana Maria SIMIONOV & Gabriela Carmen PASCARIU & Nadiia BUREIKO, 2021. "Building resilience beyond the EU’s eastern borders. EU actorness and societal perceptions in Ukraine and Republic of Moldova," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12, pages 250-272, August.
    3. repec:fpr:2020cp:4(4 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Hawkes, Corinna & Ruel, Marie T., 2011. "Value chains for nutrition:," 2020 conference papers 4, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Andrew Mitchell, 2013. "Risk and Resilience: From Good Idea to Good Practice," OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers 13, OECD Publishing.
    6. Eleanor Knott, 2015. "What Does it Mean to Be a Kin Majority? Analyzing Romanian Identity in Moldova and Russian Identity in Crimea from Below," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(3), pages 830-859, September.
    7. repec:fpr:2020cb:4(4 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Bernier, Quinn & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela, 2014. "Social capital and resilience:," IFPRI book chapters, in: Fan, Shenggen & Pandya-Lorch, Rajul & Yosef, Sivan (ed.), 2013 Global Food Policy Report, chapter 18, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomaz Ponce Dentinho & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2023. "Generalized Q analysis as a new tool in social science research - a pedagogical introduction," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 14, pages 5-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Jones & Megan Devonald & Rebecca Dutton & Sarah Baird & Workneh Yadete & Kiya Gezahegne, 2022. "Disrupted education trajectories: Exploring the effects of Covid‐19 on adolescent learning and priorities for “building back better” education systems in Ethiopia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(S2), October.
    2. Cooper, Gregory S. & Rich, Karl M. & Shankar, Bhavani & Rana, Vinay & Ratna, Nazmun N. & Kadiyala, Suneetha & Alam, Mohammad J. & Nadagouda, Sharan B., 2021. "Identifying ‘win-win-win’ futures from inequitable value chain trade-offs: A system dynamics approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Onoriu COLĂCEL, 2017. "Within the media earshot: national ideas in the Republic of Moldova prior to the 2016 election," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 8, pages 137-155, June.
    4. Maxwell, Daniel & Majid, Nisar & Adan, Guhad & Abdirahman, Khalif & Kim, Jeeyon Janet, 2016. "Facing famine: Somali experiences in the famine of 2011," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 63-73.
    5. Gabriela Carmen Pascariu & Peter Nijkamp & Karima Kourtit, 2023. "Regional science knowledge needs for the recovery of the Ukrainian spatial economy: A Q‐analysis," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 75-94, February.
    6. Ferran Sancho & Ana-Isabel Guerra & Betty Agnani, 2023. "An index of static resilience in interindustry economics," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 972.23, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
    7. Gabriela Carmen Pascariu & Oksana Holovko‐Havrysheva & Oksana Krayevska, 2023. "Ukraine: Geopolitical realities and regional development perspectives," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 3-7, February.
    8. Yupeng Cao & Zhi Chen & Qingyun Pei & Fabrizio Dimino & Lorenzo Ausiello & Prashant Kumar & K. P. Subbalakshmi & Papa Momar Ndiaye, 2024. "RiskLabs: Predicting Financial Risk Using Large Language Model Based on Multi-Sources Data," Papers 2404.07452, arXiv.org.
    9. Mykola POPOV & Ivan KOMAROVSKYI, 2020. "The "Circles Of Sustainability" Model As A Tool In Assessing The Resilience Of Local Development Policies In The Black Sea Region," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7, pages 132-153.
    10. Dario Musolino & Wim Meester & Piet Pellenbarg, 2022. "Stated locational preferences of Italian entrepreneurs: The underlying location factors," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(4), pages 1005-1021, August.
    11. Dario Musolino & Wim Meester & Piet Pellenbarg, 2020. "The mental maps of Italian, German and Dutch entrepreneurs: a comparative perspective," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 64(3), pages 595-613, June.
    12. Ranjan Roy & Animesh K. Gain & Margot A. Hurlbert & Narimah Samat & Mou Leong Tan & Ngai Weng Chan, 2021. "Designing adaptation pathways for flood-affected households in Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5386-5410, April.
    13. Alessia D’Andrea & Patrizia Grifoni & Fernando Ferri, 2023. "FADM: A Feasible Approach to Disaster Management," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(2), March.
    14. Bucovetchi Olga & Georgescu Alexandru & Gheorghe Adrian V. & Popescu Gabriel, 2024. "Understanding Resilience – a Conceptual Framework," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 2377-2385.
    15. Frankenberger, Timothy R. & Constas, Mark A. & Nelson, Suzanne & Starr, Laurie, 2014. "How NGOs approach resilience programming:," IFPRI book chapters, in: Fan, Shenggen & Pandya-Lorch, Rajul & Yosef, Sivan (ed.), 2013 Global Food Policy Report, chapter 19, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rgscpp:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:200-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1757-7802 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.