IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v16y1970i3p221-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Positive And A Normative Theory Of Income Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Tinbergen

Abstract

A positive theory of income distribution based on assumptions concerning the supply of and demand for each type of productive service is presented. The demand function of the organizers of production may be derived from the maximization of profits with the income scale and the production function as restrictions. A normative theory based on the maximization of a social utility or welfare function is also considered. In the normative theory, production functions and balance equations (some representing compartmentalization of factor markets) are introduced as restrictions and again an income scale results, this time maximizing social welfare. Empirical testing is also considered. The positive theory was developed in part to take into consideration the fact that personal income distributions can reasonably well be described by log normal distributions, and that skill parameters are often normally distributed. Limited testing of the influence of wealth, intelligence, education, and sex suggest that these account for only a small part of the variance in the income distribution. This suggests the need for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Tinbergen, 1970. "A Positive And A Normative Theory Of Income Distribution," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 16(3), pages 221-234, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:16:y:1970:i:3:p:221-234
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1970.tb00699.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1970.tb00699.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1970.tb00699.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Plug, Erik J. S. & van Praag, Bernard M. S. & Hartog, Joop, 1999. "If we knew ability, how would we tax individuals?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 183-211, May.
    2. repec:phd:pjdevt:jpd_1992_vol__xix_no__2-a is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Gary S. Becker & Nigel Tomes, 1994. "Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families," NBER Chapters, in: Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Third Edition, pages 257-298, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. ANA CECILIA PARADA ROJAS & Humberto Ríos Bolívar & JORGE OMAR RAZO DE ANDA, 2019. "Mining Of Classification Trees To Analyze A Multidimensional Phenomenon," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 9010809, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    5. Bryant, W. Keith & Bawden, D.L. & Saupe, W.E., 1981. "PART I. The Economics of Rural Poverty," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337226, january.
    6. ANA CECILIA PARADA ROJAS & Humberto Ríos Bolívar & Jorge Omar Razo De Anda, 2019. "Mining Of Classification Trees To Analyze A Multidimensional Phenomenon," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 9110842, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    7. Stark, Oded & Kobus, Martyna & Jakubek, Marcin, 2012. "A concern about low relative income, and the alignment of utilitarianism with egalitarianism," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 235-238.
    8. Syed Nawabhaider Naqvi & Asghar Qadir, 1985. "Incrementalism and Structural Change. A Technical Note," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 24(2), pages 87-102.
    9. Bauer, Johannes M., 2018. "The Internet and income inequality: Socio-economic challenges in a hyperconnected society," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 333-343.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:16:y:1970:i:3:p:221-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.