IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reesec/v41y2013i3p569-599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Segmentation of American Homes: Evidence from Denver

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Peng
  • Thomas Thibodeau

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Peng & Thomas Thibodeau, 2013. "Risk Segmentation of American Homes: Evidence from Denver," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 569-599, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:41:y:2013:i:3:p:569-599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/reec.2013.41.issue-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hill, Robert J. & Syed, Iqbal A., 2016. "Hedonic price–rent ratios, user cost, and departures from equilibrium in the housing market," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 60-72.
    2. Peter Chinloy & William D. Larson, 2017. "The Daily Microstructure of the Housing Market," FHFA Staff Working Papers 17-01, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
    3. Berna Keskin & Craig Watkins, 2017. "Defining spatial housing submarkets: Exploring the case for expert delineated boundaries," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(6), pages 1446-1462, May.
    4. Liang Peng & Lei Zhang, 2021. "House Prices and Systematic Risk: Evidence from Microdata," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1069-1092, December.
    5. Gnat Sebastian, 2019. "Measurement of entropy in the assessment of homogeneity of areas valued with the Szczecin Algorithm of Real Estate Mass Appraisal," Journal of Economics and Management, Sciendo, vol. 38(4), pages 89-106, December.
    6. Brent C Smith & Kenneth N. Daniels, 2018. "Unintended Consequences of Risk Based Pricing: Racial Differences in Mortgage Costs," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 54(3), pages 323-343, December.
    7. Waltl, Sofie R., 2018. "Estimating quantile-specific rental yields for residential housing in Sydney," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 204-225.
    8. Niu, G., 2014. "Essays on subjective expectations and mortality trends," Other publications TiSEM b9f72836-d8ad-478b-adca-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. repec:grz:wpaper:2014-03 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Liang Peng, 2020. "Benchmarking Local Commercial Real Estate Returns: Statistics Meets Economics," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1004-1029, December.
    11. Hozer Józef & Gnat Sebastian & Kokot Sebastian & Kuźmiński Wojciech, 2019. "The Problem of Designating Elementary Terrains for the Purpose of Szczecin Algorithm of Real Estate Mass Appraisal," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 42-58, September.
    12. Jianhua Gang & Liang Peng & Jinfan Zhang, 2021. "Are Pricier Houses Less Risky? Evidence from China," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 662-677, November.
    13. Ge Bao & Guoliang Feng, 2018. "Testing the Dividend Discount Model in Housing Markets: the Role of Risk," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 677-701, November.
    14. Li, Qiang & Nong, Huifu, 2022. "A closer look at Chinese housing market: Measuring intra-city submarket connectedness in Shanghai and Guangzhou," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. Mayock, Tom & Malacrida, Rachel Spritzer, 2018. "Socioeconomic and racial disparities in the financial returns to homeownership," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 80-96.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:41:y:2013:i:3:p:569-599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/areueea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.