IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/pstrev/v4y2006i2p146-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Second Edition of Lukes’ Third Face

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Shapiro

Abstract

In this article I argue for two propositions. The first is that Lukes has established the possibility of power's third face, but that the most interesting social science questions about it are empirical: How often does it operate and under what conditions? These are topics for empirical research, not armchair reflection. The second proposition I defend is that the most interesting normative questions about power are best thought of as questions of institutional design geared to preventing domination without interfering with the legitimate exercise of power. Examples in support of both propositions are supplied.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Shapiro, 2006. "On the Second Edition of Lukes’ Third Face," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 4(2), pages 146-155, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:pstrev:v:4:y:2006:i:2:p:146-155
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.000105.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.000105.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.000105.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laurie Field, 2017. "Interest Differences and Organizational Learning," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:pstrev:v:4:y:2006:i:2:p:146-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1478-9299 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.