IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v30y2021i7p2008-2026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revenue‐Sharing Contracts Under Quality Uncertainty in Remanufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Aditya Vedantam
  • Ananth Iyer

Abstract

Business users (suppliers) of information technology (IT) equipment often contract with third party remanufacturers (3PRs) for the end‐of‐use disposition of their used electronic equipment. Our goal in this research is to develop a model to analyze contracts consisting of an upfront payment (t) and a revenue share (r) between a supplier and 3PR, study their impact on disposition decisions, and explore the impact of 3PR risk‐aversion and quality uncertainty on optimum contracts. We model a Stackelberg game where the supplier offers risk protection from quality uncertainty to a 3PR. The 3PR faces a convex increasing remanufacturing cost and a sales revenue that is increasing and concave in the volume resold. We show general conditions under which a unique contract exists and can be expressed in closed form. We calibrate our model using a dataset on supplier contracts and equipment conditions provided by a 3PR. Our managerial insights are derived from the data and summarized as follows. First, there is a benefit to suppliers from characterizing the quality of used assets. Therefore, they should consider adjusting contracts to reflect asset quality. Second, suppliers can increase profit by contracting based on quality grade and using a portfolio of contracts. Third, we show that the asset age impacts contract terms, with suppliers with assets at a lower age keeping a higher revenue share and observing a greater fraction of equipment remanufactured. This suggests that suppliers should consider the benefits of disposition contracts when making equipment replacement decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Aditya Vedantam & Ananth Iyer, 2021. "Revenue‐Sharing Contracts Under Quality Uncertainty in Remanufacturing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2008-2026, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:30:y:2021:i:7:p:2008-2026
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.13370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13370
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.13370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akshay Mutha & Saurabh Bansal & V. Daniel R. Guide, 2016. "Managing Demand Uncertainty through Core Acquisition in Remanufacturing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(8), pages 1449-1464, August.
    2. V. Daniel R. Guide & Luc Muyldermans & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2005. "Hewlett-Packard Company Unlocks the Value Potential from Time-Sensitive Returns," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 281-293, August.
    3. Panos Kouvelis & Rong Li, 2019. "Integrated Risk Management for Newsvendors with Value-at-Risk Constraints," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 816-832, October.
    4. Atalay Atasu & Miklos Sarvary & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2008. "Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1731-1746, October.
    5. Guo, Shanshan & Aydin, Goker & Souza, Gilvan C., 2014. "Dismantle or remanufacture?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 580-583.
    6. Çerağ Pinçe & Mark Ferguson & Beril Toktay, 2016. "Extracting Maximum Value from Consumer Returns: Allocating Between Remarketing and Refurbishing for Warranty Claims," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 475-492, October.
    7. Yunzeng Wang & Li Jiang & Zuo-Jun Shen, 2004. "Channel Performance Under Consignment Contract with Revenue Sharing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 34-47, January.
    8. Geraldo Ferrer & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2006. "Managing New and Remanufactured Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 15-26, January.
    9. René Garcia & Éric Renault & Georges Tsafack, 2007. "Proper Conditioning for Coherent VaR in Portfolio Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 483-494, March.
    10. James D. Abbey & H. Neil Geismar & Gilvan C. Souza, 2019. "Improving Remanufacturing Core Recovery and Profitability Through Seeding," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(3), pages 610-627, March.
    11. Nektarios Oraiopoulos & Mark E. Ferguson & L. Beril Toktay, 2012. "Relicensing as a Secondary Market Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1022-1037, May.
    12. Erin C. McKie & Mark E. Ferguson & Michael R. Galbreth & Sriram Venkataraman, 2018. "How Do Consumers Choose between Multiple Product Generations and Conditions? An Empirical Study of iPad Sales on eBay," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(8), pages 1574-1594, August.
    13. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 2005. "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 30-44, January.
    14. Stefan Hahler & Moritz Fleischmann, 2017. "Strategic Grading in the Product Acquisition Process of a Reverse Supply Chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(8), pages 1498-1511, August.
    15. Lester G. Telser, 1955. "Safety First and Hedging," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 23(1), pages 1-16.
    16. V. Daniel R. Guide, Jr. & Ruud H. Teunter & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2003. "Matching Demand and Supply to Maximize Profits from Remanufacturing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 303-316, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang, Shuhua & Li, Jiajing & Sethi, Suresh P. & Wang, Xinyu, 2024. "Risk hedging for VaR-constrained newsvendors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Chu, Xiang & Wang, Rui & Lin, Yan & Li, Yantong, 2022. "Building trust in online trade-in programs with a blockchain-enabled system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    3. Cao, Jian & Wu, Sisi & Kumar, Sanjay, 2023. "Recovering and remanufacturing to fulfill EPR regulation in the presence of secondary market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    4. Ma, Xiaoyu & Huang, Feiteng & Li, Xue & Zhang, Jihong, 2024. "Optimal contract design in mobile service industry considering network congestion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    5. Qian, Zhifeng & Day, Steven James & Ignatius, Joshua & Dhamotharan, Lalitha & Chai, Junwu, 2024. "Digital advertising spillover, online-exclusive product launches, and manufacturer-remanufacturer competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 565-586.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xue, Dongmei & Teunter, Ruud H. & Zhu, Stuart X. & Zhou, Weihua, 2021. "Entering the high-end market by collecting and remanufacturing a competitor’s high-end cores," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Tianqin Shi & Dilip Chhajed & Zhixi Wan & Yunchuan Liu, 2020. "Distribution Channel Choice and Divisional Conflict in Remanufacturing Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1702-1719, July.
    3. Cao, Jian & Wu, Sisi & Kumar, Sanjay, 2023. "Recovering and remanufacturing to fulfill EPR regulation in the presence of secondary market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    4. Kleber, Rainer & Reimann, Marc & Souza, Gilvan C. & Zhang, Weihua, 2018. "On the robustness of the consumer homogeneity assumption with respect to the discount factor for remanufactured products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1027-1040.
    5. Lingfei Cai & Xuan Shi & Jingrong Zhu, 2019. "Quality Recovery or Low-End Recovery? Profitability and Environmental Impact of Durable Product Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-37, March.
    6. Borenich, Andrea & Dickbauer, Yanick & Reimann, Marc & Souza, Gilvan C., 2020. "Should a manufacturer sell refurbished returns on the secondary market to incentivize retailers to reduce consumer returns?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 569-579.
    7. Kleber, Rainer & Reimann, Marc & Souza, Gilvan C. & Zhang, Weihua, 2020. "Two-sided competition with vertical differentiation in both acquisition and sales in remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 572-587.
    8. Kleber, Rainer & Quariguasi Frota Neto, João & Reimann, Marc, 2023. "The role of part failure rates asymmetry and spare part proprietariness on remanufacturing decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 185-200.
    9. Y. Sarada & S. Sangeetha, 2022. "Coordinating a reverse supply chain with price and warranty dependent random demand under collection uncertainties," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 4119-4158, September.
    10. Gan, Shu-San & Pujawan, I Nyoman & Suparno, & Widodo, Basuki, 2018. "Pricing decisions for short life-cycle product in a closed-loop supply chain with random yield and random demands," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 174-190.
    11. Huihui Liu & Xiaohang Yue & Hui Ding & G. Keong Leong, 2017. "Optimal Remanufacturing Certification Contracts in the Electrical and Electronic Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Qingyuan Zhu & Chenghao Yu & Zhiyang SHEN & Malin Song, 2023. "Competition between a manufacturer and a relicensing third party when customers are strategic," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2021-2040, June.
    13. Erzurumlu, S. Sinan, 2013. "The compatibility of durable goods with contingent generic consumables," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 574-585.
    14. Gunasekara, Lahiru & Robb, David J. & Zhang, Abraham, 2023. "Used product acquisition, sorting and disposition for circular supply chains: Literature review and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    15. Özden Tozanlı & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Evaluation of Waste Electronic Product Trade-in Strategies in Predictive Twin Disassembly Systems in the Era of Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-33, July.
    16. Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu & Li, Gendao & Chan, Hing-Kai & Xiong, Zhongkai, 2013. "Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 15-25.
    17. Das, Debabrata & Dutta, Pankaj, 2022. "Product return management through promotional offers: The role of consumers’ loss aversion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    18. Chenxu Ke & Bo Yan & Jingna Ji, 2023. "Pricing new and remanufactured products under patent protection and government intervention," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 131-161, May.
    19. Hong Sun & Yan Li, 2023. "Optimal Acquisition and Production Policies for Remanufacturing with Quality Grading," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Huang, Yanting & Wang, Zongjun, 2017. "Values of information sharing: A comparison of supplier-remanufacturing and manufacturer-remanufacturing scenarios," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 20-44.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:30:y:2021:i:7:p:2008-2026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.