IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v28y2019i8p2044-2067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Input‐Price Risk Management: Technology Improvement and Financial Hedging

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Shantia
  • Sam Aflaki
  • Hamed Ghoddusi

Abstract

We study the merits and limitations of technology improvement (TI) initiatives for managing input–price risk. Such initiatives (e.g., energy efficiency projects) typically reduce the consumption of an input commodity and so result in lower production costs, more sustainable operations, and/or an improved competitive position. This study explores whether TI can also serve to hedge risks. Although TI clearly reduces both average cost and risk exposure, some firms may actually benefit from input–price uncertainty; the result, when combined with production flexibility, is an “option value” that firms may well be reluctant to forgo. We develop a stylized mathematical model to examine the incentives of different types of firms to adopt TI. Thus, we derive a closed‐form expression that quantifies a firm’s attitude toward input–price risk by considering the firm’s certainty premium, or what the firm would pay to “lock in” the unit input price, and then link that premium to various firm‐ and industry‐specific characteristics. We also compare the risk management advantages of technology improvement vs. financial hedging (FH) and give conditions under which these strategies are complements or substitutes. Our results show that, even when input‐price uncertainty is desirable for firms, they can still benefit from investing in risk reduction measures—such as TI and FH—because the uncertainty’s option value could thereby increase. A firm’s ability to adjust its price in response to both market competition and input‐price variation mediates the benefit of risk‐reducing measures and also affects the complementarity of these two strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Shantia & Sam Aflaki & Hamed Ghoddusi, 2019. "Input‐Price Risk Management: Technology Improvement and Financial Hedging," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(8), pages 2044-2067, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:28:y:2019:i:8:p:2044-2067
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.13030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13030
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.13030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shantia, Ali & Aflaki, Sam & Masini, Andrea, 2021. "Contracting for technology improvement: The effect of asymmetric bargaining power and investment uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 481-494.
    2. Anna Maria Gambaro & Nicola Secomandi, 2021. "A Discussion of Non‐Gaussian Price Processes for Energy and Commodity Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 47-67, January.
    3. Wei Xing & Shanshan Ma & Xuan Zhao & Liming Liu, 2022. "Operational hedging or financial hedging? Strategic risk management in commodity procurement," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(8), pages 3233-3263, August.
    4. Wang, Moran & Guo, Xiaolong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "Financial hedging in two-stage sustainable commodity supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 803-818.
    5. Canyakmaz, Caner & Özekici, Süleyman & Karaesmen, Fikri, 2024. "Risk management through financial hedging in inventory systems with stochastic price processes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    6. Sheridan Titman, 2021. "Risk Transmission Across Supply Chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(12), pages 4579-4587, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:28:y:2019:i:8:p:2044-2067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.