IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v57y2009i2p280-297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Obligations and the Limits of Transnational Citizenship

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Mason

Abstract

Notions of cosmopolitan and environmental citizenship have emerged in response to concerns about environmental sustainability and global inequality. But even if there are obligations of egalitarian justice that extend across state boundaries, or obligations of environmental justice to use resources in a sustainable way that are owed to those beyond our borders, it is far from clear that these are best conceptualised as obligations of global or environmental citizenship. Through identifying a core concept of citizenship, I suggest that citizenship obligations are, by their nature, owed (at least in part) in virtue of other aspects of one's common citizenship, and that obligations of justice, even when they arise as a result of interconnectedness or past interactions, are not best conceived as obligations of citizenship in the absence of some other bond that unites the parties. Without ruling out the possibility of beneficial conceptual change, I argue that Andrew Dobson's model of ecological citizenship is flawed because there is no good reason to regard the obligations of environmental justice which it identifies as obligations of ecological citizenship, and that other models of cosmopolitan or global citizenship face a similar objection.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Mason, 2009. "Environmental Obligations and the Limits of Transnational Citizenship," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(2), pages 280-297, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:57:y:2009:i:2:p:280-297
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00737.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00737.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00737.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dagger, Richard, 1985. "Rights, Boundaries, and the Bonds of Community: A Qualified Defense of Moral Parochialism," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 79(2), pages 436-447, June.
    2. John Horton, 2007. "In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55, pages 1-19, March.
    3. Bubeck, C., 1995. "A Feminist Approach to Citizenship," Papers 95/1, European Institute - European Forum.
    4. John Horton, 2006. "In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part One," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54, pages 427-443, October.
    5. John Horton, 2006. "In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part One," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(3), pages 427-443, October.
    6. John Horton, 2007. "In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(1), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cagdas Dedeoglu & Cansu Ekmekcioglu, 2020. "Information Infrastructures and the Future of Ecological Citizenship in the Anthropocene," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Horton, 2007. "Defending Associative Political Obligations: A Response to Richard Vernon," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(4), pages 880-884, December.
    2. Richard Vernon, 2007. "Obligation by Association? A Reply to John Horton," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(4), pages 865-879, December.
    3. John Horton, 2007. "In Defence of Associative Political Obligations: Part Two," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(1), pages 1-19, March.
    4. J. Devika, 2016. "The ‘Kudumbashree Woman’ and the Kerala Model Woman: Women and Politics in Contemporary Kerala," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 23(3), pages 393-414, October.
    5. Laura Marie Schons & John Cadogan & Roumpini Tsakona, 2017. "Should Charity Begin at Home? An Empirical Investigation of Consumers’ Responses to Companies’ Varying Geographic Allocations of Donation Budgets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 559-576, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:57:y:2009:i:2:p:280-297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.