IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v50y2002i2p209-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioural Decision Theory and the Gains Debate in International Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Mulford
  • Jeffery Berejikian

Abstract

The temptation to free ride and the fear of exploitation are traditionally offered as factors explaining individuals’ choices under conditions of social dilemma. In two experimental studies of prisoner’s dilemma behaviour we demonstrate that the ratio‐differences of payoffs are as important as the absolute differences in affecting the likelihood of cooperation. The implications of this additional structural determinant of dilemma choice are developed and applied to the stalled gains debate in international relations theory. By incorporating ratio‐differences into the analysis ‘realist’ and ‘liberal’ theories of state behaviour may be reconciled.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Mulford & Jeffery Berejikian, 2002. "Behavioural Decision Theory and the Gains Debate in International Politics," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 50(2), pages 209-229, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:50:y:2002:i:2:p:209-229
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00367
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9248.00367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James S. Mosher, 2003. "Relative Gains Concerns when the Number of States in the International System Increases," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 47(5), pages 642-668, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:50:y:2002:i:2:p:209-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.