IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/pbudge/v42y2022i2p255-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using dynamic common correlated effects approach to analyze the role of sin taxes in short‐ and long‐term fiscal surplus across US states

Author

Listed:
  • Koomin Kim

Abstract

This study empirically analyzes the role of sin taxes in short‐ and long‐run fiscal surplus and across US states via dynamic common correlated effects mean group (DCCEMG) and dynamic common correlated effects pooled mean group estimation (DCCEPMG) during a 36‐year period (1980–2015). Sin tax revenue increases long‐run fiscal surplus for all states, as shown in the log–log model; it also promotes short‐run state fiscal surplus for high‐income states, conservative state governments, and nonsouthern states. Compared to overall tax revenues that are elastic, sin taxes are inelastic revenue sources that promote states' long‐run fiscal surplus. Findings suggest that the effect of sin tax revenue on fiscal surplus varies based on state characteristics. This study contributes to the literature theoretically and practically. First, it marks an initial attempt to link sin taxes with states' fiscal conditions. Second, this study applies recent methodologies such as DCCEMG and DCCEPMG. Results offer practitioners valuable insight into the impacts of sin taxes on long‐run fiscal conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Koomin Kim, 2022. "Using dynamic common correlated effects approach to analyze the role of sin taxes in short‐ and long‐term fiscal surplus across US states," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 255-278, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:pbudge:v:42:y:2022:i:2:p:255-278
    DOI: 10.1111/pbaf.12313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12313
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/pbaf.12313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Ditzen, 2018. "Estimating dynamic common-correlated effects in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 18(3), pages 585-617, September.
    2. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2007. "A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 265-312.
    3. Chudik, Alexander & Pesaran, M. Hashem, 2015. "Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 393-420.
    4. Arun K. Srinivasan & Thomas E. Lambert, 2017. "The Impact of Stagnating Casino Revenues on State and Local Governments Tax Receipts," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 26-46, March.
    5. Niklas Potrafke & Markus Reischmann, 2015. "Fiscal Transfers and Fiscal Sustainability," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(5), pages 975-1005, August.
    6. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    7. Jan Ditzen, 2016. "xtdcce2: Estimating dynamic common correlated effects in Stata," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2016 08, Stata Users Group.
    8. Richard Wagner, 1976. "Revenue structure, fiscal illusion, and budgetary choice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 45-61, March.
    9. Wagenaar, A.C. & Maldonado-Molina, M.M. & Wagenaar, B.H., 2009. "Effects of alcohol tax increases on alcohol-related disease mortality in Alaska: Time-series analyses from 1976 to 2004," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(8), pages 1464-1470.
    10. G. S. Maddala & Shaowen Wu, 1999. "A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 61(S1), pages 631-652, November.
    11. Oates, Wallace E., 2005. "Property taxation and local public spending: the renter effect," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 419-431, May.
    12. Berry, Frances Stokes & Berry, William D., 1990. "State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(2), pages 395-415, June.
    13. Crain, Mark & Deaton, Thomas & Holcombe, Randall & Tollison, Robert, 1977. "Rational choice and the taxation of sin," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 239-245, October.
    14. repec:bla:obuest:v:61:y:1999:i:0:p:631-52 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Jan Ditzen, 2016. "xtdcce: Estimating Dynamic Common Correlated Effects in Stata," SEEC Discussion Papers 1601, Spatial Economics and Econometrics Centre, Heriot Watt University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ariff, Mohamed & Zarei, Alireza & Bhatti, M. Ishaq, 2021. "Monitoring exchange rate instability in 12 selected Islamic economies," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    2. Munir Ahmad & Heng Li & Muhammad Khalid Anser & Abdul Rehman & Zeeshan Fareed & Qingyou Yan & Gul Jabeen, 2021. "Are the intensity of energy use, land agglomeration, CO2 emissions, and economic progress dynamically interlinked across development levels?," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(4), pages 690-721, June.
    3. Zeeshan Arshad & Margarita Robaina & Anabela Botelho, 2020. "Renewable and Non-renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Natural Resources Impact on Environmental Quality: Empirical Evidence from South and Southeast Asian Countries with CS-ARDL Modeling," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 368-383.
    4. Vasudeva N.R. Murthy & Natalya Ketenci, 2021. "The Feldstein–Horioka hypothesis for African countries: Evidence from recent panel error‐correction modelling," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5762-5774, October.
    5. Namahoro, J.P. & Wu, Q. & Su, H., 2023. "Wind energy, industrial-economic development and CO2 emissions nexus: Do droughts matter?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    6. Huntington, Hillard & Liddle, Brantley, 2022. "How energy prices shape OECD economic growth: Panel evidence from multiple decades," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Joseph David, 2024. "The role of corruption in the oil price–growth relationship: Insights from oil-rich economies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 1-32, December.
    8. Guerello, Chiara & Tronzano, Marco, 2020. "“Global factors, international spillovers, and the term structure of interest rates: New evidence for Asian Countries”," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    9. Rabeya Khatoon & Md Emran Hasan & Md Wahid Ferdous Ibon & Shahidul Islam & Jeenat Mehareen & Rubaiya Murshed & Md Nahid Ferdous Pabon & Md. Jillur Rahman & Musharrat Shabnam Shuchi, 2022. "Aggregation, asymmetry, and common factors for Bangladesh’s exchange rate–trade balance relation," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 2739-2770, June.
    10. Aistov, Andrey & Nikolaeva, Tatiana, 2019. "Tourism-led growth hypothesis," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 56, pages 5-24.
    11. Kirsi Zongo & Marcellin Ndong Ntah & Jean-Marie Gankou, 2022. "Analysis of the sustainability and determinants of the current account deficit in Sub-Saharan Africa [Analyse de la viabilité et des déterminants du déficit courant en Afrique Sub-saharienne]," Working Papers hal-03577955, HAL.
    12. Çiçekçi, Cumhur & Gaygısız, Esma, 2023. "Procyclicality of fiscal policy in oil-rich countries: Roles of resource funds and institutional quality," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    13. Francois, John Nana & Ahmad, Nazneen & Keinsley, Andrew & Nti-Addae, Akwasi, 2022. "Heterogeneity in the long-run remittance-output relationship: Theory and new evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    14. Chakraborty, Saptorshee Kanto & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2020. "Energy intensity and green energy innovation: Checking heterogeneous country effects in the OECD," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 328-343.
    15. Carvelli, Gianni, 2024. "The dynamic effects of public investments on private capital formation: Modelling a heterogeneous asymmetric cointegration with unobserved global factors," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    16. Hasanov, Fakhri J. & Bulut, Cihan & Suleymanov, Elchin, 2016. "Do population age groups matter in the energy use of the oil-exporting countries?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 82-99.
    17. Gianni Carvelli, 2023. "The long-run effects of government expenditure on private investments: a panel CS-ARDL approach," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 47(3), pages 620-645, September.
    18. Eibinger, Tobias & Deixelberger, Beate & Manner, Hans, 2024. "Panel data in environmental economics: Econometric issues and applications to IPAT models," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    19. Gildas Dohba Dinga & Dobdinga Cletus Fonchamnyo & Giyoh Gideon Nginyu & Chuo Joshua Njuh, 2020. "Short and Long Run Dynamic Common Correlation Effects of External Capital Inflow on Economic Growth in SSA Countries," Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(4), pages 218-226, December.
    20. Mariam Camarero & Sergi Moliner & Cecilio Tamarit, 2022. "Which are the long-run determinants of US outward FDI? Evidence using large long-memory panels," Working Papers 2210, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:pbudge:v:42:y:2022:i:2:p:255-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0275-1100 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.