IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/labour/v12y1998i3p542-569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Pendulum Swinging Back? Patterns of Skill Change in the Machine‐Tool Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Luc Sels
  • Geert Van Hootegem

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the results of the Belgian Trend Study. The intention of this study was to examine the prevalence of new production concepts within the widest possible range of Belgian companies in the automobile, machine tool, chemical and clothing industries. The Trend‐study aimed to answer the following questions: is the Taylorist division of labour a thing of the past ? What are the alternatives? Are shifts in the division of labour accompanied by another type of personnel policy, and do traditional industrial relations have to make way for this new approach? The methodological concept used had to guarantee that the findings at the level of each industry could be generalized. In this paper, we examine the penetration of new production concepts in the main processing fields of the machine tool industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Luc Sels & Geert Van Hootegem, 1998. "Is the Pendulum Swinging Back? Patterns of Skill Change in the Machine‐Tool Industry," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 12(3), pages 542-569, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:labour:v:12:y:1998:i:3:p:542-569
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9914.00079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00079
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9914.00079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:labour:v:12:y:1998:i:3:p:542-569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrotit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.