IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v67y2018i3p687-704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling time varying heterogeneity in recurrent infection processes: an application to serological data

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Abrams
  • Andreas Wienke
  • Niel Hens

Abstract

Frailty models are often used in survival analysis to model multivariate time‐to‐event data. In infectious disease epidemiology, frailty models have been proposed to model heterogeneity in the acquisition of infection and to accommodate association in the occurrence of multiple types of infection. Although traditional frailty models rely on the assumption of lifelong immunity after recovery, refinements have been made to account for reinfections with the same pathogen. Recently, Abrams and Hens quantified the effect of misspecifying the underlying infection process on the basic and effective reproduction number in the context of bivariate current status data on parvovirus B19 and varicella zoster virus. Furthermore, Farrington, Unkel and their co‐workers introduced and applied time varying shared frailty models to paired bivariate serological data. In this paper, we consider an extension of the proposed frailty methodology by Abrams and Hens to account for age‐dependence in individual heterogeneity through the use of age‐dependent shared and correlated gamma frailty models. The methodology is illustrated by using two data applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Abrams & Andreas Wienke & Niel Hens, 2018. "Modelling time varying heterogeneity in recurrent infection processes: an application to serological data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(3), pages 687-704, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:67:y:2018:i:3:p:687-704
    DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12236
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssc.12236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:67:y:2018:i:3:p:687-704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.