IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v57y2008i5p589-607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Semiparametric two‐sample changepoint model with application to human immunodeficiency virus studies

Author

Listed:
  • Zonghui Hu
  • Jing Qin
  • Dean Follmann

Abstract

Summary. A two‐sample changepoint model is proposed to investigate the difference between two treatments or devices. Under our semiparametric approach, no assumptions are made about the underlying distributions of the measurements from the two treatments or devices, but a parametric link is assumed between the two. The parametric link contains the possible changepoint where the two distributions start to differ. We apply the maximum empirical likelihood for model estimation and show the consistency of the changepoint estimator. An extended changepoint model is studied to handle data censored because of detection limits in viral load assays of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Permutation and bootstrap procedures are proposed to test the existence of a changepoint and the goodness of fit of the model. The performance of the semiparametric changepoint model is compared with that of parametric models in a simulation study. We provide two applications in HIV studies: one is a randomized placebo‐controlled study to evaluate the effects of a recombinant glycoprotein 120 vaccine on HIV viral load; the other is a study to compare two types of tubes in handling plasma samples for viral load determination.

Suggested Citation

  • Zonghui Hu & Jing Qin & Dean Follmann, 2008. "Semiparametric two‐sample changepoint model with application to human immunodeficiency virus studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 57(5), pages 589-607, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:57:y:2008:i:5:p:589-607
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2008.00632.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2008.00632.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2008.00632.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter B. Gilbert & Ronald J. Bosch & Michael G. Hudgens, 2003. "Sensitivity Analysis for the Assessment of Causal Vaccine Effects on Viral Load in HIV Vaccine Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 531-541, September.
    2. Zhong Guan, 2004. "A semiparametric changepoint model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(4), pages 849-862, December.
    3. Haitao Chu & Lawrence H. Moulton & Wendy J. Mack & Douglas J. Passaro & Paulo F. Barroso & Alvaro Muñoz, 2005. "Correlating two continuous variables subject to detection limits in the context of mixture distributions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 54(5), pages 831-845, November.
    4. Dean A. Follmann & Michael A. Proschan, 1999. "A Multivariate Test of Interaction for Use in Clinical Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 1151-1155, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dean Follmann, 2006. "Augmented Designs to Assess Immune Response in Vaccine Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 1161-1169, December.
    2. Fan Li & Constantine E. Frangakis, 2006. "Polydesigns and Causal Inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 343-351, June.
    3. Andrea Mercatanti & Fan Li, 2017. "Do debit cards decrease cash demand?: causal inference and sensitivity analysis using principal stratification," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(4), pages 759-776, August.
    4. Michael R. Elliott & Marshall M. Joffe & Zhen Chen, 2006. "A Potential Outcomes Approach to Developmental Toxicity Analyses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 352-360, June.
    5. Constantine E. Frangakis & Donald B. Rubin & Ming-Wen An & Ellen MacKenzie, 2007. "Rejoinder," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 658-662, September.
    6. Gilbert Peter B. & Blette Bryan S. & Hudgens Michael G. & Shepherd Bryan E., 2020. "Post-randomization Biomarker Effect Modification Analysis in an HIV Vaccine Clinical Trial," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 54-69, January.
    7. VanderWeele Tyler J, 2011. "Principal Stratification -- Uses and Limitations," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, July.
    8. Yannis Jemiai & Andrea Rotnitzky & Bryan E. Shepherd & Peter B. Gilbert, 2007. "Semiparametric estimation of treatment effects given base‐line covariates on an outcome measured after a post‐randomization event occurs," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(5), pages 879-901, November.
    9. Zou, Changliang & Liu, Yukun & Qin, Peng & Wang, Zhaojun, 2007. "Empirical likelihood ratio test for the change-point problem," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(4), pages 374-382, February.
    10. Venkata Jandhyala & Stergios Fotopoulos & Ian MacNeill & Pengyu Liu, 2013. "Inference for single and multiple change-points in time series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 423-446, July.
    11. Linbo Wang & Thomas S. Richardson & Xiao-Hua Zhou, 2017. "Causal analysis of ordinal treatments and binary outcomes under truncation by death," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(3), pages 719-735, June.
    12. Dean Follmann & Michael P. Fay & Michael Proschan, 2009. "Chop-Lump Tests for Vaccine Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 885-893, September.
    13. Kwonsang Lee & Dylan S. Small & Paul R. Rosenbaum, 2018. "A powerful approach to the study of moderate effect modification in observational studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 1161-1170, December.
    14. Gabriela Ciuperca & Zahraa Salloum, 2015. "Empirical likelihood test in a posteriori change-point nonlinear model," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(8), pages 919-952, November.
    15. Paul R. Rosenbaum, 2015. "Bahadur Efficiency of Sensitivity Analyses in Observational Studies," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 205-217, March.
    16. Zhu, Xiaoqian & Xie, Yongjia & Li, Jianping & Wu, Dengsheng, 2015. "Change point detection for subprime crisis in American banking: From the perspective of risk dependence," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 18-28.
    17. James Y. Dai & Peter B. Gilbert & Benoît R. Mâsse, 2012. "Partially Hidden Markov Model for Time-Varying Principal Stratification in HIV Prevention Trials," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(497), pages 52-65, March.
    18. R. Bajorunaite & V. Brazauskas, 2008. "Method of trimmed moments for robust fitting of parametric failure time models," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(3), pages 341-360.
    19. Bryan E. Shepherd & Peter B. Gilbert & Charles T. Dupont, 2011. "Sensitivity Analyses Comparing Time-to-Event Outcomes Only Existing in a Subset Selected Postrandomization and Relaxing Monotonicity," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 1100-1110, September.
    20. Shanshan Luo & Wei Li & Yangbo He, 2023. "Causal inference with outcomes truncated by death in multiarm studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 502-513, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:57:y:2008:i:5:p:589-607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.