IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v45y1996i1p73-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appropriate Critical Values When Testing for a Single Multivariate Outlier by Using the Mahalanobis Distance

Author

Listed:
  • Kay I. Penny

Abstract

The Mahalanobis distance is a well‐known criterion which may be used for detecting outliers in multivariate data. However, there are some discrepancies about which critical values are suitable for this purpose. Following a comparison with Wilks's method, this paper shows that the previously recommended (p(n – 1)/(n – p)}Fp,n–p are unsuitable, and p(n – 1)2 Fp,n–p–t /n(n – p – 1 + pFp,n‐p–1) are the correct critical values when searching for a single outlier. The importance of which critical values should be used is illustrated when searching for a single outlier in a clinical laboratory data set containing 10 patients and five variables. The jackknifed Mahalanobis distance is also discussed and the relevant critical values are given. Finally, upper bounds for the usual Mahalanobis distance and the jackknifed version are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kay I. Penny, 1996. "Appropriate Critical Values When Testing for a Single Multivariate Outlier by Using the Mahalanobis Distance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 45(1), pages 73-81, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:45:y:1996:i:1:p:73-81
    DOI: 10.2307/2986224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2986224
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2986224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Louisa Lorenz & Anne Doherty & Patricia Casey, 2019. "The Role of Religion in Buffering the Impact of Stressful Life Events on Depressive Symptoms in Patients with Depressive Episodes or Adjustment Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Neil H. Spencer, 2009. "Overcoming the multiple‐testing problem when testing randomness," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(4), pages 543-553, September.
    3. Emily Groenewald & Gary Van Vuuren, 2024. "Visualisation of Mahalanobis Distances for Trivariate JOINT Distributions," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 203-206, March.
    4. Marta Kowal & Piotr Sorokowski, 2022. "Sex Differences in Physical Attractiveness Investments: Overlooked Side of Masculinity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-9, March.
    5. Schwertman, Neil C. & Owens, Margaret Ann & Adnan, Robiah, 2004. "A simple more general boxplot method for identifying outliers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 165-174, August.
    6. Stavros D Veresoglou & Barry Thornton & George Menexes & Andreas P Mamolos & Demetrios S Veresoglou, 2012. "Soil Fertilization Leads to a Decline in Between-Samples Variability of Microbial Community δ13C Profiles in a Grassland Fertilization Experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8, September.
    7. Gyula Gyebnár & Zoltán Klimaj & László Entz & Dániel Fabó & Gábor Rudas & Péter Barsi & Lajos R Kozák, 2019. "Personalized microstructural evaluation using a Mahalanobis-distance based outlier detection strategy on epilepsy patients’ DTI data – Theory, simulations and example cases," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, September.
    8. Paola Montero Ledezma, 2017. "The Growth of World Trade: The Robustness of the Evidence," Investigación & Desarrollo, Universidad Privada Boliviana, vol. 2(1), pages 5-19.
    9. Philipp Kruse & Florian Rosing, 2023. "An Experimental Investigation of Perceived Differences in Personality and Leadership Attributes of Social Entrepreneurs Compared to for Profit Entrepreneurs and Non-Profit Organisations Leaders," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 32(1), pages 75-110, March.
    10. Schwertman, Neil C. & de Silva, Rapti, 2007. "Identifying outliers with sequential fences," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 3800-3810, May.
    11. Gökhan Akıncı & Lutfihak Alpkan & Bora Yıldız & Gaye Karacay, 2022. "The Link between Ambidextrous Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior in a Military Organization: The Moderating Role of Climate for Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Petr Pleticha, 2021. "Heterogeneity of Returns to Business R&D: What Makes a Difference?," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(3), pages 253-271.
    13. Philipp Kruse & Eleanor Meda Chipeta & Imke Ueberschär, 2023. "What Keeps Social Entrepreneurs Happy? Exploring Personality, Work Design, External Support, and Social Impact as Resources of Social Entrepreneurs’ Mental Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Mauro Mussini, 2014. "Decomposing inequality change from the perspective of reranking and income growth between income groups," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 619-637, September.
    15. Ronald Campoverde-Aguirre & Mauricio Carvache-Franco & Wilmer Carvache-Franco & María Almeida-Cabrera, 2022. "Analysis of the Quality of Service in Gastronomic Festivals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    16. César Merino-Soto & Alicia Boluarte Carbajal & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano & Laura A. Nabors & Miguel Ángel Núñez-Benítez, 2022. "A New Story on the Multidimensionality of the MSPSS: Validity of the Internal Structure through Bifactor ESEM," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Petr Pleticha, . "Heterogeneity of Returns to Business R&D: What Makes a Difference?," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 0.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:45:y:1996:i:1:p:73-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.