IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v82y2020i1p175-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The conditional permutation test for independence while controlling for confounders

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas B. Berrett
  • Yi Wang
  • Rina Foygel Barber
  • Richard J. Samworth

Abstract

We propose a general new method, the conditional permutation test, for testing the conditional independence of variables X and Y given a potentially high dimensional random vector Z that may contain confounding factors. The test permutes entries of X non‐uniformly, to respect the existing dependence between X and Z and thus to account for the presence of these confounders. Like the conditional randomization test of Candès and co‐workers in 2018, our test relies on the availability of an approximation to the distribution of X|Z—whereas their test uses this estimate to draw new X‐values, for our test we use this approximation to design an appropriate non‐uniform distribution on permutations of the X‐values already seen in the true data. We provide an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo sampler for the implementation of our method and establish bounds on the type I error in terms of the error in the approximation of the conditional distribution of X|Z, finding that, for the worst‐case test statistic, the inflation in type I error of the conditional permutation test is no larger than that of the conditional randomization test. We validate these theoretical results with experiments on simulated data and on the Capital Bikeshare data set.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas B. Berrett & Yi Wang & Rina Foygel Barber & Richard J. Samworth, 2020. "The conditional permutation test for independence while controlling for confounders," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(1), pages 175-197, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:82:y:2020:i:1:p:175-197
    DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12340
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssb.12340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maomao Ding & Ruosha Li & Jin Qin & Jing Ning, 2023. "A double‐robust test for high‐dimensional gene coexpression networks conditioning on clinical information," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3227-3238, December.
    2. David M. Ritzwoller & Joseph P. Romano & Azeem M. Shaikh, 2024. "Randomization Inference: Theory and Applications," Papers 2406.09521, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:82:y:2020:i:1:p:175-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.