IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v77y2015i1p107-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantile regression adjusting for dependent censoring from semicompeting risks

Author

Listed:
  • Ruosha Li
  • Limin Peng

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="rssb12063-abs-0001"> We study quantile regression when the response is an event time subject to potentially dependent censoring. We consider the semicompeting risks setting, where the time to censoring remains observable after the occurrence of the event of interest. Although such a scenario frequently arises in biomedical studies, most of current quantile regression methods for censored data are not applicable because they generally require the censoring time and the event time to be independent. By imposing quite mild assumptions on the association structure between the time-to-event response and the censoring time variable, we propose quantile regression procedures, which allow us to garner a comprehensive view of the covariate effects on the event time outcome as well as to examine the informativeness of censoring. An efficient and stable algorithm is provided for implementing the new method. We establish the asymptotic properties of the resulting estimators including uniform consistency and weak convergence. The theoretical development may serve as a useful template for addressing estimating settings that involve stochastic integrals. Extensive simulation studies suggest that the method proposed performs well with moderate sample sizes. We illustrate the practical utility of our proposals through an application to a bone marrow transplant trial.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruosha Li & Limin Peng, 2015. "Quantile regression adjusting for dependent censoring from semicompeting risks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 77(1), pages 107-130, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:77:y:2015:i:1:p:107-130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rssb.2014.77.issue-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin-Jian Hsieh & Hong-Rui Wang, 2018. "Quantile regression based on counting process approach under semi-competing risks data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(2), pages 395-419, April.
    2. Lee, Minjung & Han, Junhee, 2016. "Covariate-adjusted quantile inference with competing risks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 57-63.
    3. Ruosha Li & Yu Cheng & Qingxia Chen & Jason Fine, 2017. "Quantile association for bivariate survival data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 506-516, June.
    4. Daniel Nevo & Deborah Blacker & Eric B. Larson & Sebastien Haneuse, 2022. "Modeling semiā€competing risks data as a longitudinal bivariate process," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 922-936, September.
    5. Lu, Shuiyun & Chen, Xiaolin & Xu, Sheng & Liu, Chunling, 2020. "Joint model-free feature screening for ultra-high dimensional semi-competing risks data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:77:y:2015:i:1:p:107-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.