IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v67y2005i2p219-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian classification of tumours by using gene expression data

Author

Listed:
  • Bani K. Mallick
  • Debashis Ghosh
  • Malay Ghosh

Abstract

Summary. Precise classification of tumours is critical for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Diagnostic pathology has traditionally relied on macroscopic and microscopic histology and tumour morphology as the basis for the classification of tumours. Current classification frameworks, however, cannot discriminate between tumours with similar histopathologic features, which vary in clinical course and in response to treatment. In recent years, there has been a move towards the use of complementary deoxyribonucleic acid microarrays for the classi‐fication of tumours. These high throughput assays provide relative messenger ribonucleic acid expression measurements simultaneously for thousands of genes. A key statistical task is to perform classification via different expression patterns. Gene expression profiles may offer more information than classical morphology and may provide an alternative to classical tumour diagnosis schemes. The paper considers several Bayesian classification methods based on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces for the analysis of microarray data. We consider the logistic likelihood as well as likelihoods related to support vector machine models. It is shown through simulation and examples that support vector machine models with multiple shrinkage parameters produce fewer misclassification errors than several existing classical methods as well as Bayesian methods based on the logistic likelihood or those involving only one shrinkage parameter.

Suggested Citation

  • Bani K. Mallick & Debashis Ghosh & Malay Ghosh, 2005. "Bayesian classification of tumours by using gene expression data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 219-234, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:67:y:2005:i:2:p:219-234
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00498.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00498.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00498.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chakraborty, Sounak, 2009. "Simultaneous cancer classification and gene selection with Bayesian nearest neighbor method: An integrated approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1462-1474, February.
    2. Luts, Jan & Ormerod, John T., 2014. "Mean field variational Bayesian inference for support vector machine classification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 163-176.
    3. Dixit, Anand & Roy, Vivekananda, 2021. "Posterior impropriety of some sparse Bayesian learning models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Richard D. Payne & Bani K. Mallick, 2018. "Two-Stage Metropolis-Hastings for Tall Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 35(1), pages 29-51, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:67:y:2005:i:2:p:219-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.