IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v65y2003i2p503-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classical model selection via simulated annealing

Author

Listed:
  • S. P. Brooks
  • N. Friel
  • R. King

Abstract

Summary. The classical approach to statistical analysis is usually based upon finding values for model parameters that maximize the likelihood function. Model choice in this context is often also based on the likelihood function, but with the addition of a penalty term for the number of parameters. Though models may be compared pairwise by using likelihood ratio tests for example, various criteria such as the Akaike information criterion have been proposed as alternatives when multiple models need to be compared. In practical terms, the classical approach to model selection usually involves maximizing the likelihood function associated with each competing model and then calculating the corresponding criteria value(s). However, when large numbers of models are possible, this quickly becomes infeasible unless a method that simultaneously maximizes over both parameter and model space is available. We propose an extension to the traditional simulated annealing algorithm that allows for moves that not only change parameter values but also move between competing models. This transdimensional simulated annealing algorithm can therefore be used to locate models and parameters that minimize criteria such as the Akaike information criterion, but within a single algorithm, removing the need for large numbers of simulations to be run. We discuss the implementation of the transdimensional simulated annealing algorithm and use simulation studies to examine its performance in realistically complex modelling situations. We illustrate our ideas with a pedagogic example based on the analysis of an autoregressive time series and two more detailed examples: one on variable selection for logistic regression and the other on model selection for the analysis of integrated recapture–recovery data.

Suggested Citation

  • S. P. Brooks & N. Friel & R. King, 2003. "Classical model selection via simulated annealing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(2), pages 503-520, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:65:y:2003:i:2:p:503-520
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00399
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9868.00399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. R. King & S. P. Brooks & B. J. T. Morgan & T. Coulson, 2006. "Factors Influencing Soay Sheep Survival: A Bayesian Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 211-220, March.
    2. Guarin, Alexander & Lozano, Ignacio, 2017. "Credit funding and banking fragility: A forecasting model for emerging economies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 168-189.
    3. Ignacio Lozano-Espitia & Alexander Guarín-López, 2015. "Fragilidad bancaria en Colombia: un análisis basado en las hojas de balance," Chapters, in: Jose E. Gomez-Gonzalez & Jair N. Ojeda-Joya (ed.), Política monetaria y estabilidad financiera en economías pequeñas y abiertas, chapter 10, pages 301-338, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    4. Alexander Guarín-López & Ignacio Lozano-Espitia, 2016. "Credit Funding and Banking Fragility: An Empirical Analysis for Emerging Economies," Borradores de Economia 14306, Banco de la Republica.
    5. Ricardo S. Ehlers & Stephen P. Brooks, 2008. "Adaptive Proposal Construction for Reversible Jump MCMC," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 35(4), pages 677-690, December.
    6. Ignacio Lozano & Alexander Guarín, 2014. "Banking fragility in Colombia: An empirical analysis based on balance sheets," Revista ESPE - Ensayos Sobre Política Económica, Banco de la República, vol. 32(75), pages 48-63, December.
    7. Fleming, Christopher L. & Griffis, Stanley E. & Bell, John E., 2013. "The effects of triangle inequality on the vehicle routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 1-7.
    8. Fouskakis, D., 2012. "Bayesian variable selection in generalized linear models using a combination of stochastic optimization methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 414-422.
    9. Kapetanios, George & Marcellino, Massimiliano & Papailias, Fotis, 2016. "Forecasting inflation and GDP growth using heuristic optimisation of information criteria and variable reduction methods," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 369-382.
    10. Seya, Hajime & Yamagata, Yoshiki & Tsutsumi, Morito, 2013. "Automatic selection of a spatial weight matrix in spatial econometrics: Application to a spatial hedonic approach," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 429-444.
    11. Gustavo Nicolás Páez, 2015. "Prediciendo decisiones de agentes económicos: ¿Cómo determina el Banco de la República de Colombia la tasa de interés?," Documentos CEDE 12567, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    12. Zhenzhong Wang & Zhengyuan Zhu & Cindy Yu, 2020. "Variable Selection in Macroeconomic Forecasting with Many Predictors," Papers 2007.10160, arXiv.org.
    13. Christian P. Robert & Xiao‐Li Meng & Jesper Møller & Jeffrey S Rosenthal & C Jennison & M. A Hurn & F Al‐Awadhi & Peter McCullagh & Christophe Andrieu & Arnaud Doucet & Petros Dellaportas & Ioulia Pap, 2003. "Discussion on the paper by Brooks, Giudici and Roberts," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(1), pages 39-55, January.
    14. S. P. Brooks & P. Giudici & G. O. Roberts, 2003. "Efficient construction of reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo proposal distributions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(1), pages 3-39, January.
    15. S. A. Sisson & Y. Fan, 2009. "Towards automating model selection for a mark–recapture–recovery analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(2), pages 247-266, May.
    16. Manfred Gilli & Peter Winker, 2008. "Review of Heuristic Optimization Methods in Econometrics," Working Papers 001, COMISEF.
    17. Qian, Guoqi & Zhao, Xindong, 2007. "On time series model selection involving many candidate ARMA models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 6180-6196, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:65:y:2003:i:2:p:503-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.