IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v62y2000i4p773-786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regression analysis under non‐standard situations: a pairwise pseudolikelihood approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kung‐Yee Liang
  • Jing Qin

Abstract

Regression analysis is one of the most used statistical methods for data analysis. There are, however, many situations in which one cannot base inference solely on f(y∣x; β), the conditional probability (density) function for the response variable Y, given x, the covariates. Examples include missing data where the missingness is non‐ignorable, sampling surveys in which subjects are selected on the basis of the Y‐values and meta‐analysis where published studies are subject to ‘selection bias’. The conventional approaches require the correct specification of the missingness mechanism, sampling probability and probability for being published respectively. In this paper, we propose an alternative estimating procedure for β based on an idea originated by Kalbfleisch. The novelty of this method is that no assumption on the missingness probability mechanisms etc. mentioned above is required to be specified. Asymptotic efficiency calculations and simulation studies were conducted to compare the method proposed with the two existing methods: the conditional likelihood and the weighted estimating function approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Kung‐Yee Liang & Jing Qin, 2000. "Regression analysis under non‐standard situations: a pairwise pseudolikelihood approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(4), pages 773-786.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:62:y:2000:i:4:p:773-786
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00263
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9868.00263?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:62:y:2000:i:4:p:773-786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.