IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v62y2025i2p879-922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Birds of a Feather are Punished Together, or Not? Examining Heterogeneity in Career Advancements of Minority Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Maima Aulia Syakhroza
  • Jan Lodge

Abstract

In this study we examine the heterogeneous effects of being affiliated with different minority groups on employees’ career advancements in organizations. We draw on the categories literature and its concept of category distance to hypothesize why some minority groups may be more (dis)advantaged than others in their career advancements. To do so, we define category distance in terms of shared identity markers between groups, where identity markers are salient attributes that audiences commonly associate a group with. We test our hypotheses among religious minority groups using employment data from a large Indonesian government organization. Our results indicate that minority groups closer in distance to the organizational majority group are more penalized in their career advancements than minority groups further in distance. These results hold both at the group and at the individual level. Through our study we make contributions to the literatures on careers, categories, and the burgeoning study of religion in organizations. We conclude with implications for practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Maima Aulia Syakhroza & Jan Lodge, 2025. "Birds of a Feather are Punished Together, or Not? Examining Heterogeneity in Career Advancements of Minority Groups," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 879-922, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:62:y:2025:i:2:p:879-922
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.13077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13077
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.13077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:62:y:2025:i:2:p:879-922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.