IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v56y2019i1p203-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Offshoring, Institutional Context and Innovation Performance: A Meta‐Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Rosenbusch
  • Michael Gusenbauer
  • Isabella Hatak
  • Matthias Fink
  • Klaus E. Meyer

Abstract

Innovation offshoring (IO) has become a widespread management practice. Yet, evidence on the performance implications is inconsistent, and scattered across disciplines and contexts. We argue that the benefits firms can derive from IO depend on the institutional environment at home. Drawing on recent work on institutional theory in international business, we explore institutions that facilitate reverse knowledge transfer and/or institutional arbitrage with respect to innovation‐related activities. The results of our meta‐analysis that synthesizes evidence from 48 samples show that IO is related positively to innovation performance. As predicted, this relationship is moderated by differences in the institutional environments across countries. Specifically, when national innovation systems are weak at home, IO appears to enable institutional arbitrage strategy whereas Confucian cultures enable more effective reverse knowledge transfer. However, contrary to our expectations, the beneficial effects of IO appear to have diminished over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Rosenbusch & Michael Gusenbauer & Isabella Hatak & Matthias Fink & Klaus E. Meyer, 2019. "Innovation Offshoring, Institutional Context and Innovation Performance: A Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 203-233, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:56:y:2019:i:1:p:203-233
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12407
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:56:y:2019:i:1:p:203-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.