IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v55y2018i5p837-872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating Ambivalence: Perceived Organizational Prestige–Support Discrepancy and Its Relation to Employee Cynicism and Silence

Author

Listed:
  • Karim Mignonac
  • Olivier Herrbach
  • Carolina Serrano Archimi
  • Caroline Manville

Abstract

Drawing on the social identity literature, this study offers theoretical arguments and empirical evidence to understand reactions to divergent perceptions of organizational external prestige (PEP) and organizational support (POS) – two crucial bases of employees’ social worth. Across three studies, using both experimental and field data, we find that PEP‐POS discrepancy contributes to employees’ perceptions of organizational cynicism and silence behaviour, especially when PEP is high and POS is low (rather than the reverse). Consistent with our social identity perspective, we find that ambivalent identification, that is, the simultaneous identification and disidentification of an individual with an organization, is a key mediating mechanism that transfers the interactive relationship of PEP and POS to cynicism and silence. These findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamics of individuals’ social worth at work.

Suggested Citation

  • Karim Mignonac & Olivier Herrbach & Carolina Serrano Archimi & Caroline Manville, 2018. "Navigating Ambivalence: Perceived Organizational Prestige–Support Discrepancy and Its Relation to Employee Cynicism and Silence," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 837-872, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:55:y:2018:i:5:p:837-872
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12330
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Margelytė-Pleskienė Aida & Vveinhardt Jolita, 2018. "The Quintessence of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Cynicism," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 80(1), pages 67-88, December.
    2. Lucas Dufour & Massimo Maoret & Francesco Montani, 2020. "Coupling High Self‐Perceived Creativity and Successful Newcomer Adjustment in Organizations: The Role of Supervisor Trust and Support for Authentic Self‐Expression," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(8), pages 1531-1555, December.
    3. Laura J. Reeves & Alexandra Bristow, 2024. "Political Organisational Silence and the Ethics of Care: EU Migrant Restaurant Workers in Brexit Britain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(4), pages 825-844, November.
    4. Guiling Yue & Haoqiang Wei & Noor Ullah Khan & Roselina Ahmad Saufi & Mohd Fathi Abu Yaziz & Hanieh Alipour Bazkiaei, 2023. "Does the Environmental Management System Predict TBL Performance of Manufacturers? The Role of Green HRM Practices and OCBE as Serial Mediators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Pengfei Cheng & Jingxuan Jiang & Zhuangzi Liu, 2022. "The Influence of Perceived External Prestige on Emotional Labor of Frontline Employees: The Mediating Roles of Organizational Identification and Impression Management Motive," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:55:y:2018:i:5:p:837-872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.