IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v20y1983i4p467-475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Japanese And British Managerial Colleagues—How They View Each Other

Author

Listed:
  • J. E. Everett
  • B. W. Stening

Abstract

The mutual perceptions were obtained of 113 Japanese and 100 British managers working in the London offices of 18 Japanese companies. Eighteen semantic differential items were used to permit each respondent to report his auto stereotype of his own nationality of manager, his hetero stereotype of the other nationality, and his meta stereotype (his opinion as to how they would assess his own group). The degree of agreement between the auto stereotype of each group and the hetero stereotype held of it by the other group is discussed, and the accuracy of the meta stereotypes is examined. It is also shown that the 18 semantic items can be reduced to 3 principal components which, after rotation, are consistent in meaning between the two nationalities. The three rotated factors are interpretable as ‘approval’, ‘open style’ and ‘functional’. The factors permit a more concise comparison of the stereotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • J. E. Everett & B. W. Stening, 1983. "Japanese And British Managerial Colleagues—How They View Each Other," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 467-475, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:20:y:1983:i:4:p:467-475
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00220.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00220.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00220.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:20:y:1983:i:4:p:467-475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.