IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v19y1982i1p3-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Congealing Oil: Inventing Ideologies To Justify Acting Ideologies Out

Author

Listed:
  • William H. Starbuck

Abstract

Studies of organizations in crisis show how forcefully and universally ideologies affect organizations, and life in general. Under the influence of societal and organizational ideologies, quite normal organizations manufacture crises for themselves, and then escape or succumb, depending on which ideologies dominate. Yet organization theorists have paid little attention to the ideological elements in organizations—apparently because of misguided perceptions that objectively measurable phenomena are more real or more important. Organization theorists have carried out numerous studies of so‐called objective phenomena, and their aggregate finding is that almost nothing correlates strongly and consistently with anything else. This null finding fits the hypothesis that organizational structures and technologies are primarily arbitrary, temporary, and superficial characteristics. These characteristics are determined by complex interactions among ideologies‐ although determined may be an inappropriate description because people acting under the influence of ideologies perceive that they are choosing freely. Ideologies are logically integrated clusters of beliefs, values, rituals, and symbols. The interactions among elements within an ideology enable a change by one element to produce far‐reaching effects. The interactions between ideologies are probably controlled by ceremonies and rituals, and communications between ideologies emphasize stylized or metaphorical language. One can see rituals and language at work when organizations are acting. Organizations can act in either of two modes: a problem‐solving mode in which perceived problems instigate searches for solutions, or an action generating mode in which choices of actions stimulate the creation of problems to justify the actions. Problem solving is abnormal, and action generating normal. In the action‐generating mode, people watch the results of their actions, appraise these results as good or bad, and propose needs for action. Whether needs for action are real is decided by collective voting in which votes are phrased as clichts about causation. These clichts give birth to quasi‐theories that explain why certain actions are needed to solve problems.

Suggested Citation

  • William H. Starbuck, 1982. "Congealing Oil: Inventing Ideologies To Justify Acting Ideologies Out," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 3-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:19:y:1982:i:1:p:3-27
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00057.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00057.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00057.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alan D. Meyer & Vibha Gaba & Kenneth A. Colwell, 2005. "Organizing Far from Equilibrium: Nonlinear Change in Organizational Fields," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(5), pages 456-473, October.
    2. Kosheleva, S.V. & Zavyalova, E.K. & Tsybova, V.S. & Kucherov, D.G. & Alsufyev, A.I., 2014. "Managing innovation in Russian competitive companies:The role of HRM," Working Papers 6388, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    3. Hallensleben, Tobias & Jain, Anil K., 2012. ""Wir müssen hier sehr schnell konstruieren": Diskurs und Institutionelle Reflexivität," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 3/2012, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    4. Juha-Antti Lamberg & Jukka Luoma, 2021. "Ideology in Vicarious Learning–Related Communication," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 708-730, May.
    5. Mazur Karolina, 2019. "Symbolic action and organizational resources acquisition and exploitation," Management, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 32-48, December.
    6. Dierkes, Meinolf, 1988. "Unternehmenskultur und Unternehmensführung: konzeptionelle Ansätze und gesicherte Erkenntnisse," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58(5/6), pages 554-575.
    7. Martina K. Linnenluecke & Andrew Griffiths & Monika Winn, 2012. "Extreme Weather Events and the Critical Importance of Anticipatory Adaptation and Organizational Resilience in Responding to Impacts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 17-32, January.
    8. Goran Vlašić & Josef Langer, 2012. "Concept of reputation: different perspectives and robust empirical understandings," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 24(2), pages 219-244.
    9. Xixi Li & J. J. Po-An Hsieh & Arun Rai, 2013. "Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 659-682, September.
    10. F J Burdett & M G Bradford, 1988. "An Organisational Approach to Analysis of Policy Innovation by Local Authorities in Britain: The Importance of the Concepts of Scrutiny, Conflict, and Centralisation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 6(2), pages 159-172, June.
    11. Rogers, Patricia J. & Hough, Gary, 1995. "Improving the effectiveness of evaluations: Making the link to organizational theory," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 321-332.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4638 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Philippe Baumard, 1998. "Starbuck, William Haynes (1934 –)," Post-Print hal-03230911, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:19:y:1982:i:1:p:3-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.