IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v18y1981i3p321-340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualizing The Goal And System Models Of Organizational Effectiveness —Implications For Comparative Evaluation Research

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Strasser
  • J. D. Eveland
  • Gaylord Cummins
  • O. Lynn Deniston
  • John H. Romani

Abstract

The lack of comparative evaluation research on organizational‐effectiveness models is the primary focus of this discussion. Problems in conceptually and operationally defining evaluation models, such as those in the goal and system model classes, are the proposed reason for this lack of comparative research. In this paper, goal and system models are formally defined in terms of their historical origins, underlying criteria and differing methods of application. A goal and system model classification continuum is also presented. Five comparative evaluation research questions are proposed and their implications for research are discussed. From a theoretical perspective this paper attempts to go beyond the sound foundation laid by Campbell (1977) in his discussion of these two schools of thought on organizational effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Strasser & J. D. Eveland & Gaylord Cummins & O. Lynn Deniston & John H. Romani, 1981. "Conceptualizing The Goal And System Models Of Organizational Effectiveness —Implications For Comparative Evaluation Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 321-340, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:18:y:1981:i:3:p:321-340
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1981.tb00105.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1981.tb00105.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1981.tb00105.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. İsa Yıldırım, 2022. "What Is the Role of Organizational Cynicism in School Effectiveness?," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    2. Hamann, P. Maik & Schiemann, Frank, 2021. "Organizational performance as a set of four dimensions: An empirical analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 45-65.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:18:y:1981:i:3:p:321-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.