IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v75y2024i4p454-468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Types of domain and task‐solving information in media scholars' data interaction

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Korkeamäki
  • Heikki Keskustalo
  • Sanna Kumpulainen

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine what types of domain and task‐solving information media scholars need while interacting with research data to create new knowledge. The study is situated within information interaction research in information science. The approach is user‐oriented and qualitative. The research data consist of interviews of 25 media scholars about their interactions with research data. In the analysis, deductive and inductive approaches were combined to identify domain and task‐solving information types from the interview data. The results show that media scholars needed two domain information types and three task‐solving information types while interacting with research data. The domain information types were (1) earlier research information and (2) experience‐based domain information. The task‐solving information types were (1) information about methods and tools, (2) information about rules and norms, and (3) self‐created task‐supporting information. Of these, experience‐based domain information and self‐created task‐supporting information have been less considered in prior research on domain and task‐solving information. The findings of this study are useful for providing support for data interaction. Furthermore, the study sheds light on the concepts of domain information and task‐solving information in the context of interacting with research data.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Korkeamäki & Heikki Keskustalo & Sanna Kumpulainen, 2024. "Types of domain and task‐solving information in media scholars' data interaction," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(4), pages 454-468, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:75:y:2024:i:4:p:454-468
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24863
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara M. Wildemuth, 2004. "The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(3), pages 246-258, February.
    2. Jingjing Liu & Xiangmin Zhang, 2019. "The role of domain knowledge in document selection from search results," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(11), pages 1236-1247, November.
    3. Libby Hemphill & Margaret L. Hedstrom & Susan Hautaniemi Leonard, 2021. "Saving social media data: Understanding data management practices among social media researchers and their implications for archives," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(1), pages 97-109, January.
    4. David Allen & Stan Karanasios & Mira Slavova, 2011. "Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(4), pages 776-788, April.
    5. David Allen & Stan Karanasios & Mira Slavova, 2011. "Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(4), pages 776-788, April.
    6. Sheila Pontis & Ann Blandford & Elke Greifeneder & Hesham Attalla & David Neal, 2017. "Keeping up to date: An academic researcher's information journey," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(1), pages 22-35, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalie Pang & Stan Karanasios & Misita Anwar, 2020. "Exploring the Information Worlds of Older Persons During Disasters," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(6), pages 619-631, June.
    2. Franklin Riley & David K. Allen & Thomas Daniel Wilson, 2022. "When politicians and the experts collide: Organization and the creation of information spheres," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(8), pages 1127-1139, August.
    3. Ann Svensson, 2020. "Identifying Motives for Implementing eHealth by using Activity Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Rong Tang & Bharat Mehra & Jia Tina Du & Yuxiang (Chris) Zhao, 2021. "Framing a discussion on paradigm shift(s) in the field of information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(2), pages 253-258, February.
    5. Ngoc Quyet Le & Shankar Sankaran, 2023. "The importance of interactions in supporting online study," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 39(1), pages 105-113, January.
    6. Evaristo Kangwa, 2022. "Compatibility of Problem Solving Theory and Activity Theory," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(10), pages 34-41, October.
    7. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou & Eli Hustad, 2023. "Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 955-969, June.
    8. Isto Huvila, 2022. "Making and taking information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 528-541, April.
    9. Nelson, Sarah Beth & Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein & Thomson, Leslie, 2017. "Mobility of knowledge work and affordances of digital technologies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 54-62.
    10. Lynda Tamine & Cécile Chouquet & Thomas Palmer, 2015. "Analysis of biomedical and health queries: Lessons learned from TREC," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2626-2642, December.
    11. Iris Xie & Soohyung Joo, 2010. "Tales from the Field: Search Strategies Applied in Web Searching," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Hui Liu & Dong Rong Zhang & Qing Shan Zhou & Bin Li, 2024. "For perpetuating social media collective memory proactively and inclusively: Explore the interests and tensions of stakeholders in preservation actions," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(6), pages 734-748, June.
    13. Stephann Makri, 2020. "Information informing design: Information Science research with implications for the design of digital information environments," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1402-1412, November.
    14. Yong‐Mi Kim, 2010. "The adoption of university library Web site resources: A multigroup analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(5), pages 978-993, May.
    15. Ling-Ling Wu & Mu-Hsuan Huang & Ching-Yi Chen, 2012. "Citation patterns of the pre-web and web-prevalent environments: The moderating effects of domain knowledge," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(11), pages 2182-2194, November.
    16. Vera Granikov & Reem El Sherif & France Bouthillier & Pierre Pluye, 2022. "Factors and outcomes of collaborative information seeking: A mixed studies review with a framework synthesis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 542-560, April.
    17. Renáta Németh, 2023. "A scoping review on the use of natural language processing in research on political polarization: trends and research prospects," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 289-313, April.
    18. Yujia Zhai & Ying Ding & Hezhao Zhang, 2021. "Innovation adoption: Broadcasting versus virality," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(4), pages 403-416, April.
    19. Sanna Kumpulainen & Elina Late, 2022. "Struggling with digitized historical newspapers: Contextual barriers to information interaction in history research activities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(7), pages 1012-1024, July.
    20. K A Dowsland & M Gilbert & G Kendall, 2007. "A local search approach to a circle cutting problem arising in the motor cycle industry," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(4), pages 429-438, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:75:y:2024:i:4:p:454-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.