IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v67y2016i5p1052-1067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On online collaboration and construction of shared knowledge: Assessing mediation capability in computer supported argument visualization tools

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Iandoli
  • Ivana Quinto
  • Anna De Liddo
  • Simon Buckingham Shum

Abstract

Collaborative Computer‐Supported Argument Visualization (CCSAV) has often been proposed as an alternative over more conventional, mainstream platforms for online discussion (e.g., online forums and wikis). CCSAV tools require users to contribute to the creation of a joint artifact (argument map) instead of contributing to a conversation. In this paper we assess empirically the effects of this fundamental design choice and show that the absence of conversational affordances and socially salient information in representation‐centric tools is detrimental to the users' collaboration experience. We report empirical findings from a study in which subjects using different collaborative platforms (a forum, an argumentation platform, and a socially augmented argumentation tool) were asked to discuss and predict the price of a commodity. By comparing users' experience across several metrics we found evidence that the collaborative performance decreases gradually when we remove conversational interaction and other types of socially salient information. We interpret these findings through theories developed in conversational analysis (common ground theory) and communities of practice and discuss design implications. In particular, we propose balancing the trade‐off between knowledge reification and participation in representation‐centric tools with the provision of social feedback and functionalities supporting meaning negotiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Iandoli & Ivana Quinto & Anna De Liddo & Simon Buckingham Shum, 2016. "On online collaboration and construction of shared knowledge: Assessing mediation capability in computer supported argument visualization tools," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1052-1067, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:67:y:2016:i:5:p:1052-1067
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.23481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23481
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.23481?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikos Karacapilidis & Manolis Tzagarakis & Nikos Karousos & George Gkotsis & Vassilis Kallistros & Spyros Christodoulou & Christos Mettouris, 2009. "Tackling Cognitively-Complex Collaboration with CoPe_it!," International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), IGI Global, vol. 4(3), pages 22-38, July.
    2. Hollis,, 2007. "Rational Economic Man," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521033886, November.
    3. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    4. Gilles N'Goala, 2007. "Vers une nouvelle génération de CRM," Post-Print halshs-02914872, HAL.
    5. Nikos Karacapilidis & Manolis Tzagarakis, 2007. "Web-Based Collaboration and Decision Making Support: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach," International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), IGI Global, vol. 2(4), pages 12-23, October.
    6. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miloslava Černá & Anna Borkovcová, 2020. "YouTube Dominance in Sustainability of Gaining Knowledge via Social Media in University Setting—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Wadee Alhalabi & Miltiadis Lytras & Nada Aljohani, 2021. "Crowdsourcing Research for Social Insights into Smart Cities Applications and Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Mohammed Abdo Albaom & Fatimah Sidi & Marzanah A. Jabar & Rusli Abdullah & Iskandar Ishak & Nur Anita Yunikawati & Magistyo Purboyo Priambodo & Mohammed Saleh Nusari & Dhakir Abbas Ali, 2022. "The Moderating Role of Personal Innovativeness in Tourists’ Intention to Use Web 3.0 Based on Updated Information Systems Success Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-35, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    2. Globisch, Joachim & Dütschke, Elisabeth & Schleich, Joachim, 2018. "Acceptance of electric passenger cars in commercial fleets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 122-129.
    3. Michael Addotey-Delove & Richard E. Scott & Maurice Mars, 2023. "Healthcare Workers’ Perspectives of mHealth Adoption Factors in the Developing World: Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-27, January.
    4. Nistor, Cristian, 2013. "A conceptual model for the use of social media in companies," MPRA Paper 44224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Peter Bou Saba & Régis Meissonier, 2016. "Conflict contagion effects from previous IT projects: action research during preliminary phases of a DST implementation project [Effets de contagion de conflits de projets TI antérieurs:Une recherc," Post-Print hal-02161336, HAL.
    6. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    7. Youngcheoul Kang & Nakbum Choi & Seoyong Kim, 2021. "Searching for New Model of Digital Informatics for Human–Computer Interaction: Testing the Institution-Based Technology Acceptance Model (ITAM)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-36, May.
    8. Shafiqul Islam & Mohammad Fakhrul Islam & Noor-E- Zannat, 2023. "Behavioral Intention to Use Online for Shopping in Bangladesh: A Technology Acceptance Model Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    9. Xin Xu & Viswanath Venkatesh & Kar Yan Tam & Se-Joon Hong, 2010. "Model of Migration and Use of Platforms: Role of Hierarchy, Current Generation, and Complementarities in Consumer Settings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(8), pages 1304-1323, August.
    10. Sharath Sasidharan & Radhika Santhanam & Daniel J. Brass & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2012. "The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 658-678, September.
    11. Juan F. Tavera Mesías & Juan C. Sánchez Giraldo & Bernardo Ballesteros Díaz, 2011. "Aceptación del E-Commerce en Colombia: un estudio para la ciudad de Medellín," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, December.
    12. BHINDER Hardaman Singh & NAYAK Kamakshya Prasad & KUMAR Vineet, 2021. "The Technology Acceptance Model and Learning Management System: A Study on Undergraduate Tourism and Hospitality Students," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 02, June.
    13. Zhiqiang Yuan & Jing Liu & Xi Deng & Tianzi Ding & Tommy Tanu Wijaya, 2023. "Facilitating Conditions as the Biggest Factor Influencing Elementary School Teachers’ Usage Behavior of Dynamic Mathematics Software in China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Driediger, Fabian & Bhatiasevi, Veera, 2019. "Online grocery shopping in Thailand: Consumer acceptance and usage behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 224-237.
    15. Yadgar Taha M. Hamakhan, 2020. "The effect of individual factors on user behaviour and the moderating role of trust: an empirical investigation of consumers’ acceptance of electronic banking in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    16. Johannes Putzke & Detlef Schoder & Kai Fischbach, 2010. "Adoption of Mass-Customized Newspapers: An Augmented Technology Acceptance Perspective," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 143-164.
    17. Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Marinkovic, Veljko & Ramos de Luna, Iviane & Kalinic, Zoran, 2018. "Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 117-130.
    18. Deborah Compeau & Barbara Marcolin & Helen Kelley & Chris Higgins, 2012. "Research Commentary ---Generalizability of Information Systems Research Using Student Subjects---A Reflection on Our Practices and Recommendations for Future Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1093-1109, December.
    19. Chen Wei, 2021. "The influence of Consumers’ Purchase intention on Smart Wearable Device: A study of Consumers in East China," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(8), pages 46-72.
    20. Wang, Xiaoying & Sadiq, Ramla & Khan, Tahseen Mohsan & Wang, Rong, 2021. "Industry 4.0 and intellectual capital in the age of FinTech," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:67:y:2016:i:5:p:1052-1067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.