IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v63y2012i2p218-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Literature-based discovery: Beyond the ABCs

Author

Listed:
  • Neil R. Smalheiser

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil R. Smalheiser, 2012. "Literature-based discovery: Beyond the ABCs," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(2), pages 218-224, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:63:y:2012:i:2:p:218-224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/asi.21599
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Don R. Swanson & Neil R. Smalheiser & A. Bookstein, 2001. "Information discovery from complementary literatures: Categorizing viruses as potential weapons," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 52(10), pages 797-812.
    2. Yoo-Ah Kim & Stefan Wuchty & Teresa M Przytycka, 2011. "Identifying Causal Genes and Dysregulated Pathways in Complex Diseases," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Mark A. Spasser, 1997. "The enacted fate of undiscovered public knowledge," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 48(8), pages 707-717, August.
    4. Simone Fari, 2007. "Words on the Web. Comparative analysis of telecommunication’s history in Italy and Spain," ThE Papers 07/01, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    5. Aled M. Edwards & Ruth Isserlin & Gary D. Bader & Stephen V. Frye & Timothy M. Willson & Frank H. Yu, 2011. "Too many roads not taken," Nature, Nature, vol. 470(7333), pages 163-165, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrej Kastrin & Dimitar Hristovski, 2021. "Scientometric analysis and knowledge mapping of literature-based discovery (1986–2020)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1415-1451, February.
    2. Agniv Adhikari & Paramita Das & Abhik Mukherjee, 2019. "Generating a representative keyword subset pertaining to an academic conference series," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 749-770, May.
    3. Nakamura, Hiroko & Suzuki, Shinji & Sakata, Ichiro & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2015. "Knowledge combination modeling: The measurement of knowledge similarity between different technological domains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 187-201.
    4. Herman H H B M van Haagen & Peter A C 't Hoen & Barend Mons & Erik A Schultes, 2013. "Generic Information Can Retrieve Known Biological Associations: Implications for Biomedical Knowledge Discovery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-9, November.
    5. Yuya Kajikawa, 2022. "Reframing evidence in evidence-based policy making and role of bibliometrics: toward transdisciplinary scientometric research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5571-5585, September.
    6. Kostoff, Ronald N. & Patel, Uptal, 2015. "Literature-related discovery and innovation: Chronic kidney disease," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 341-351.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David H Drewry & Carrow I Wells & David M Andrews & Richard Angell & Hassan Al-Ali & Alison D Axtman & Stephen J Capuzzi & Jonathan M Elkins & Peter Ettmayer & Mathias Frederiksen & Opher Gileadi & Na, 2017. "Progress towards a public chemogenomic set for protein kinases and a call for contributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Gold, E. Richard, 2021. "The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(5).
    3. Oded Netzer & Ronen Feldman & Jacob Goldenberg & Moshe Fresko, 2012. "Mine Your Own Business: Market-Structure Surveillance Through Text Mining," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 521-543, May.
    4. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    5. Calvin McCarter & Judie Howrylak & Seyoung Kim, 2020. "Learning gene networks underlying clinical phenotypes using SNP perturbation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Florin Ratajczak & Mitchell Joblin & Marcel Hildebrandt & Martin Ringsquandl & Pascal Falter-Braun & Matthias Heinig, 2023. "Speos: an ensemble graph representation learning framework to predict core gene candidates for complex diseases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Ronald N. Kostoff, 2014. "Literature-related discovery: common factors for Parkinson’s Disease and Crohn’s Disease," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(3), pages 623-657, September.
    8. Wei Zhang & Takayo Ota & Viji Shridhar & Jeremy Chien & Baolin Wu & Rui Kuang, 2013. "Network-based Survival Analysis Reveals Subnetwork Signatures for Predicting Outcomes of Ovarian Cancer Treatment," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Wang, Zhixiao & Rui, Xiaobin & Yuan, Guan & Cui, Jingjing & Hadzibeganovic, Tarik, 2021. "Endemic information-contagion outbreaks in complex networks with potential spreaders based recurrent-state transmission dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 573(C).
    10. Ronald N. Kostoff & Stephen A. Morse, 2011. "Structure and infrastructure of infectious agent research literature: SARS," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 195-209, January.
    11. Ming-Yueh Tsay, 2009. "Citation analysis of Ted Nelson’s works and his influence on hypertext concept," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 79(3), pages 451-472, June.
    12. Yi Bu & Tian-yi Liu & Win-bin Huang, 2016. "MACA: a modified author co-citation analysis method combined with general descriptive metadata of citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(1), pages 143-166, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:63:y:2012:i:2:p:218-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.