IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfnres/v30y2007i3p379-398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liquidity And Asset Pricing Under The Three‐Moment Capm Paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Duong Nguyen
  • Suchismita Mishra
  • Arun Prakash
  • Dilip K. Ghosh

Abstract

We examine whether the use of the three‐moment capital asset pricing model can account for liquidity risk. We also make a comparative analysis of a four‐factor model based on Fama–French and Pástor–Stambaugh factors versus a model based solely on stock characteristics. Our findings suggest that neither of the models captures the liquidity premium nor do stock characteristics serve as proxies for liquidity. We also find that sensitivities of stock return to fluctuations in market liquidity do not subsume the effect of characteristic liquidity. Furthermore, our empirical findings are robust to differences in market microstructure or trading protocols between NYSE/AMEX and NASDAQ.

Suggested Citation

  • Duong Nguyen & Suchismita Mishra & Arun Prakash & Dilip K. Ghosh, 2007. "Liquidity And Asset Pricing Under The Three‐Moment Capm Paradigm," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 30(3), pages 379-398, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:30:y:2007:i:3:p:379-398
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6803.2007.00219.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2007.00219.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2007.00219.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Márcio André Veras Machado & Otávio Ribeiro de Medeiros, 2012. "Does the liquidity effect exist in the brazilian stock market?," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 9(4), pages 27-50, October.
    2. Assefa, Tibebe A. & Mollick, André Varella, 2014. "African stock market returns and liquidity premia," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 325-342.
    3. Lischewski, Judith & Voronkova, Svitlana, 2012. "Size, value and liquidity. Do They Really Matter on an Emerging Stock Market?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 8-25.
    4. Huong Le & Andros Gregoriou, 2021. "Liquidity and asset pricing: evidence from a new free-float-adjusted price impact ratio," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 49(4), pages 751-771, June.
    5. Lam, Keith S.K. & Tam, Lewis H.K., 2011. "Liquidity and asset pricing: Evidence from the Hong Kong stock market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 2217-2230, September.
    6. Huong Le & Andros Gregoriou, 2020. "How Do You Capture Liquidity? A Review Of The Literature On Low‐Frequency Stock Liquidity," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 1170-1186, December.
    7. Florackis, Chris & Gregoriou, Andros & Kostakis, Alexandros, 2011. "Trading frequency and asset pricing on the London Stock Exchange: Evidence from a new price impact ratio," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 3335-3350.
    8. French, Joseph J. & Taborda, Rodrigo, 2018. "Disentangling the relationship between liquidity and returns in Latin America," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 23-40.
    9. Choong Tze Chua & Jeremy Goh & Zhe Zhang, 2010. "Expected Volatility, Unexpected Volatility, And The Cross‐Section Of Stock Returns," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 33(2), pages 103-123, June.
    10. Xuan Vinh Vo & Hong Thu Bui, 2016. "Liquidity, liquidity risk and stock returns: evidence from Vietnam," International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 67-89.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:30:y:2007:i:3:p:379-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.