IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfnres/v26y2003i4p517-534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Underwriting Costs of Initial Public Offerings by Investment and Commercial Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Paige Fields
  • Donald Fraser
  • Rahul Bhargava

Abstract

We examine differences in underwriting costs between commercial‐bank‐Section‐20‐underwritten initial public offerings (IPOs) and investment‐bank‐underwritten IPOs. Our results suggest that total underwriting costs (gross margin plus underpricing) are significantly lower for commercial bank IPOs. The lower cost for commercial bank IPOs is attributable to less severe underpricing for these issues. Gross margin costs generally do not differ between commercial bank and investment bank issues. Furthermore, we find that the long‐run stock price performance for commercial bank issues is superior to that of investment bank issues. That is, lower underpricing for Section 20 issues may not be a short‐run phenomenon. Rather, there appears to be a favorable outcome for investors in the long run for holding IPOs underwritten by Section 20 commercial banks. These results are inconsistent with the conflict of interest hypothesis often associated with merging commercial and investment bank functions in one organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Paige Fields & Donald Fraser & Rahul Bhargava, 2003. "A Comparison of Underwriting Costs of Initial Public Offerings by Investment and Commercial Banks," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 26(4), pages 517-534, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:26:y:2003:i:4:p:517-534
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-6803.00072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6803.00072
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-6803.00072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ber, Y. & Yafeh, Y. & Yosha, O., 1997. "Conflict of Interest in Universal Banking: Evidence from the Post-Issue performance of IPO Firms," Papers 18-97, Tel Aviv.
    2. Hedva Ber & Yishay Yafeh & Oved Yosha, 1997. "Conflict of Interest in Universal Banking: Evidence from the Post-­Issue Performance of IPO Firms," Bank of Israel Working Papers 1997.05, Bank of Israel.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wolfgang Bessler & Andreas Kurth, 2007. "Agency Problems and the Performance of Venture-backed IPOs in Germany: Exit Strategies, Lock-up Periods, and Bank Ownership," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 29-63.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asher Blass & Yishay Yafeh, 1998. "Vagabond Shoes Longing to Stray ­Why Israeli Firms List in New York Causes and Implications," Bank of Israel Working Papers 1998.02, Bank of Israel.
    2. Krausz, Miriam & Paroush, Jacob, 2002. "Financial advising in the presence of conflict of interests," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 55-71.
    3. Puri, Manju, 1999. "Commercial banks as underwriters: implications for the going public process," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 133-163, October.
    4. Agarwal, Rajshree & Ann Elston, Julie, 2001. "Bank-firm relationships, financing and firm performance in Germany," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 225-232, August.
    5. Asher Blass & Yishay Yafeh & Oved Yosha, 1998. "Corporate Governance In An Emerging Market: The Case Of Israel," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 10(4), pages 79-89, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:26:y:2003:i:4:p:517-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.