IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfnres/v25y2002i2p169-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are the Best Small Companies the Best Investments?

Author

Listed:
  • W. Scott Bauman
  • C. Mitchell Conover
  • Don R. Cox

Abstract

Previous research finds that large companies previously judged to be excellent growth companies have subsequently been poor investments. We examine small companies selected by Business Week on the basis of multiple criteria used in annual articles featuring highly rated growth companies. We study the investment performance over the three years before eleven annual Business Week publications and the three years after publication. We find positive excess returns in the pre‐publication period, but negative excess returns in the post‐publication period. This reversal in investment performance appears to be due to a mean‐reversion tendency in operating performance, in which the earnings and the past rates of return on capital of such companies subsequently decrease significantly.

Suggested Citation

  • W. Scott Bauman & C. Mitchell Conover & Don R. Cox, 2002. "Are the Best Small Companies the Best Investments?," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 169-186, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:25:y:2002:i:2:p:169-186
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-6803.t01-1-00002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6803.t01-1-00002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-6803.t01-1-00002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Greg Filbeck & Xin Zhao & Ryan Knoll, 2017. "An analysis of working capital efficiency and shareholder return," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 265-288, January.
    2. King, Michael R. & Segal, Dan, 2008. "Market segmentation and equity valuation: Comparing Canada and the United States," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 245-258, July.
    3. Gerald Lander, 2006. "Returns of Small Growth Stocks: An Empirical Analysis," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 12(4), pages 475-490, November.
    4. Michael R. King & Dan Segal, 2003. "Valuation of Canadian- vs. U.S.-Listed Equity: Is There a Discount?," Staff Working Papers 03-6, Bank of Canada.
    5. repec:kap:iaecre:v:12:y:2006:i:4:p:475-490 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Yu, Susana & Lord, Richard A. & Webb, Gwendolyn, 2010. "The hot-growth companies: How well do analysts predict their performance?," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 195-219, May.
    7. Susana Yu & Sang-Hoon Kim, 2009. "Analysis of Business Week hot-growth stocks: Momentum and fundamental investment approaches," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(3), pages 192-204, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:25:y:2002:i:2:p:169-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.