Commitment to a Process Innovation: Nucor, USX, and Thin‐Slab Casting
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1111/j.1430-9134.1993.00135.x
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Sharon Oster, 1982. "The Diffusion of Innovation among Steel Firms: The Basic Oxygen Furnace," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(1), pages 45-56, Spring.
- Judith R. Gelman & Steven C. Salop, 1983. "Judo Economics: Capacity Limitation and Coupon Competition," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 14(2), pages 315-325, Autumn.
- Reinganum, Jennifer F, 1983.
"Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(4), pages 741-748, September.
- Reinganum, Jennifer R., 1982. "Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly," Working Papers 431, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
- Jean Tirole, 1988. "The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262200716, April.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Luís Cabral & Cristian Dezső, 2008.
"Technology Adoption with Multiple Alternative Designs and the Option to Wait,"
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(2), pages 413-441, June.
- Luis Cabral, 2004. "Technology Adoption with Multiple Alternative Designs and the Option to Wait," Working Papers 04-17, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
- Byong‐Duk Rhee & Seth W. Norton, 2001. "Strategic Quality Decisions under Heterogeneous Resource Endowments," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 235-264, June.
- Han T. J. Smit & Lenos Trigeorgis, 2017. "Strategic NPV: Real Options and Strategic Games under Different Information Structures," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(13), pages 2555-2578, December.
- David A. Hennessy, 1998.
"Technology Adoption and Welfare under a Monopoly: An Illustration of Microeconomic Policy Analysis,"
The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 111-117, June.
- Hennessy, David A., 1998. "Technology Adoption and Welfare Under a Monopoly: An Illustration of Microeconomic Policy Analysis," Staff General Research Papers Archive 1206, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
- Pankaj Ghemawat, 1994. "Competitive Advantage and Internal Organization: Nucor Revisited," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 685-717, December.
- Mikko Ketokivi & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2020. "Transaction Cost Economics As a Theory of Supply Chain Efficiency," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1011-1031, April.
- Robert A. Ritz, 2009. "Carbon leakage under incomplete environmental regulation: An industry-level approach," Economics Series Working Papers 461, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
- Levin, Mark (Левин, Марк) & Matrosova, Kseniya (Матросова, Ксения), 2015. "Innovation management based concidering advertising and complementarity of public and private levels of technology [Управление Инновациями С Учетом Рекламы И Комплементарности Общественного И Частн," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 109-132.
- Hillary Ekisa Nambanga & Jianpei Li, 2021. "Threat of Entry, Complete Information and Pricing," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(5), pages 161-182.
- Richard A. Jensen, 2004. "Multiplant Firms and Innovation Adoption and Diffusion," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 70(3), pages 661-671, January.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Daniel Ferreira & Thomas Kittsteiner, 2016.
"When Does Competition Foster Commitment?,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(11), pages 3199-3212, November.
- Ferreira, Daniel & Kittsteiner, Thomas, 2016. "When does competition foster commitment?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62746, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Stavins, Robert & Jaffe, Adam & Newell, Richard, 2000.
"Technological Change and the Environment,"
Working Paper Series
rwp00-002, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
- Jaffe, Adam B. & Newell, Richard G. & Stavins, Robert N., 2001. "Technological Change and the Environment," Discussion Papers 10566, Resources for the Future.
- Stavins, Robert & Jaffe, Adam & Newell, Richard, 2000. "Technological Change and the Environment," RFF Working Paper Series dp-00-47, Resources for the Future.
- Adam B. Jaffe & Richard G. Newell & Robert N. Stavins, 2000. "Technological Change and the Environment," NBER Working Papers 7970, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Matthew Selove, 2014. "A Dynamic Model of Competitive Entry Response," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 353-363, May.
- Flavio DelbonoBy & Luca Lambertini, 2022.
"Innovation and product market concentration: Schumpeter, arrow, and the inverted U-shape curve [Lessons from schumpeterian growth theory],"
Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(1), pages 297-311.
- F. Delbono & L. Lambertini, 2017. "Innovation and product market concentration: Schumpeter, Arrow and the inverted-U shape curve," Working Papers wp2006, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
- Grzegorz Pawlina & Peter M. Kort, 2006.
"Real Options in an Asymmetric Duopoly: Who Benefits from Your Competitive Disadvantage?,"
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 1-35, March.
- Pawlina, G. & Kort, P.M., 2001. "Real Options in an Aymmetric Duopoly : Who Benefits from your Competitive Disadvantage," Other publications TiSEM e997e0f6-3d0f-4cbe-b97a-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Pawlina, G. & Kort, P.M., 2001. "Real Options in an Aymmetric Duopoly : Who Benefits from your Competitive Disadvantage," Discussion Paper 2001-95, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Garella, Paolo G., 2012.
"Monopoly incentives for cost-reducing R&D,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 21-24.
- Paolo Giorgio GARELLA, 2010. "Monopoly incentives to cost-reducing R&D," Departmental Working Papers 2010-06, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano, revised 27 Mar 2012.
- Philipp Weinschenk, 2009. "Persistence of Monopoly and Research Specialization," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2009_11, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Zhixi Wan & Brian Wu, 2017. "When Suppliers Climb the Value Chain: A Theory of Value Distribution in Vertical Relationships," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 477-496, February.
- Bourreau, Marc, 2004.
"The impact of uncertainty about demand growth on preemption,"
Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 363-376.
- Marc Bourreau, 2004. "The impact of uncertainty about demand growth on preemption," Post-Print hal-02085308, HAL.
- Susan Helper, 1995. "Supplier Relations and Adoption of New Technology: Results of Survey Research in the U.S. Auto Industry," NBER Working Papers 5278, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Tunay I. Tunca & Qiong Wu, 2013. "Fighting Fire with Fire: Commercial Piracy and the Role of File Sharing on Copyright Protection Policy for Digital Goods," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 436-453, June.
- S. Baranzoni & P. Bianchi & L. Lambertini, 2000. "Multiproduct Firms, Product Differentiation, and Market Structure," Working Papers 368, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
- Wolfgang Becker & Jurgen Peters, 1998. "R&D-Competition Between Vertical Corporate Networks: Market Structure and Strategic R&D-Spillovers," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 51-72.
- Lukach, R. & Kort, P.M. & Plasmans, J.E.J., 2005.
"Optimal R&D Investment Strategies with Quantity Competition under the Threat of Superior Entry,"
Other publications TiSEM
f41be61a-5422-43b2-9080-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Ruslan Lukach & Peter M. Kort & Joseph Plasmans, 2005. "Optimal R&D Investment Strategies with Quantity Competition under the Threat of Superior Entry," CESifo Working Paper Series 1385, CESifo.
- Thomas J. Holmes & David K. Levine & James A. Schmitz, 2012.
"Monopoly and the Incentive to Innovate When Adoption Involves Switchover Disruptions,"
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 4(3), pages 1-33, August.
- Thomas J. Holmes & David K. Levine & James A. Schmitz, 2008. "Monopoly and the incentive to innovate when adoption involves switchover disruptions," Staff Report 402, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
- Thomas J. Holmes & David K. Levine & James A. Schmitz, Jr., 2008. "Monopoly and the Incentive to Innovate When Adoption Involves Switchover Disruptions," NBER Working Papers 13864, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Thomas J Holmes & David K Levine & James A Schmitz Jr, 2008. "Monopoly and the Incentive to Innovate When Adoption Involves Switchover Disruptions," Levine's Working Paper Archive 122247000000001920, David K. Levine.
- Mahdiyeh Entezarkheir & Saeed Moshiri, 2021. "Innovation spillover and merger decisions," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 2419-2448, November.
- Xavier Y. Wauthy & Nicolas Boccard, 2017. "Relaxing quality differentiation through capacity limitation: A note," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 13(2), pages 233-244, June.
- Ping Lin & Tianle Zhang & Wen Zhou, 2020.
"Vertical integration and disruptive cross‐market R&D,"
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 51-73, January.
- Lin, Ping & Zhang, Tianle & Zhou, Wen, 2017. "Vertical Integration and Disruptive Cross-Market R&D," MPRA Paper 95435, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Matsumura Toshihiro & Matsushima Noriaki, 2010. "When Small Firms Fight Back Against Large Firms in R&D Activities," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-42, September.
- Yongmin Chen & Marius Schwartz, 2013.
"Product Innovation Incentives: Monopoly vs. Competition,"
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 513-528, September.
- Yongmin Chen and Marius Schwartz, 2009. "Product Innovation Incentives: Monopoly vs. Competition," Working Papers gueconwpa~09-09-02, Georgetown University, Department of Economics.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:2:y:1993:i:1:p:135-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/journals/JEMS/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.