IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v62y2024i5p1260-1277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Overlap and Bureaucratic Actors: How EU–NATO Relations Empower the European Commission

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Hoeffler
  • Stephanie C. Hofmann

Abstract

Organizational overlap is a ubiquitous feature in regional governance. Most studies have focused on member states, demonstrating that overlap enables states differently. We still know little about whether and how overlapping organizations impact international bureaucracies and how this shapes the relationship between bureaucratic actors within organizations. We argue that overlap can empower international bureaucrats, but not equally. Those with autonomous resources from member states are the most attractive interlocuters for bureaucrats from other organizations and, hence, likely to become most empowered. Substantive expertise and formal competence are less consequential in this context. We unpack this argument by looking at a policy domain understood to be heavily guarded by member states, security and defence policy. Based on primary documents and interviews, we show that the European Union (EU)–North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) overlap has enabled the European Commission to leverage its position within the EU to its advantage and further encroach on the EU's security and defence activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Hoeffler & Stephanie C. Hofmann, 2024. "Organizational Overlap and Bureaucratic Actors: How EU–NATO Relations Empower the European Commission," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 1260-1277, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:62:y:2024:i:5:p:1260-1277
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13571
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13571?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:62:y:2024:i:5:p:1260-1277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.