IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v61y2023i4p970-987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A ‘Geopolitical Commission’: Supranationalism Meets Global Power Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Haroche

Abstract

This article examines the origins and operationalisation of the concept of a ‘geopolitical Commission’, which has been promoted by President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen since 2019. This concept has been used to guide the stronger co‐ordination of the external aspects of the Commission's work. It is also symptomatic of the growing role of strategic considerations in the Commission's recent initiatives, particularly through the objective of strengthening the EU's ‘open strategic autonomy’. To explain this phenomenon, I combine three different theoretical perspectives: neorealism, neofunctionalism, and geoeconomics. I conclude that the geopolitical Commission should be understood as the result of the interactions between exogenous factors – the intensification of global power competition and the rise of geoeconomic strategies – and endogenous factors, such as the rivalry between the Commission and the European External Action Service and the functional link between the Commission's economic powers and international security issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Haroche, 2023. "A ‘Geopolitical Commission’: Supranationalism Meets Global Power Competition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 970-987, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:61:y:2023:i:4:p:970-987
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13440
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13440?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marianne Riddervold, 2016. "(Not) in the Hands of the Member States: How the European Commission Influences EU Security and Defence Policies," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 353-369, March.
    2. Sophie Meunier & Kalypso Nicolaidis, 2019. "The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(S1), pages 103-113, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Paula Brandão & Isabel Camisão, 2022. "Playing the Market Card: The Commission's Strategy to Shape EU Cybersecurity Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1335-1355, September.
    2. Thomas Jacobs & Niels Gheyle & Ferdi De Ville & Jan Orbie, 2023. "The Hegemonic Politics of ‘Strategic Autonomy’ and ‘Resilience’: COVID‐19 and the Dislocation of EU Trade Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 3-19, January.
    3. Benjamin Bürbaumer, 2021. "The Limits of Traditional Bargaining under Deep Integration: TTIP Stumbling over Technical Barriers to Trade," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1069-1085, September.
    4. Camille Nessel & Elke Verhaeghe, 2022. "‘A Force for Good’: The Narrative Construction of Ethical EU–Vietnam Trade Relations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 741-758, May.
    5. Sandra Eckert, 2021. "The European Green Deal and the EU's Regulatory Power in Times of Crisis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(S1), pages 81-91, September.
    6. Darie Flavius Cosmin & Miron Alexandra Dorina & Ciurea Iulia Cristina, 2024. "Geoeconomic Dynamics in a New Economic Global Order from West to East," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 469-481.
    7. Sarah Bauerle Danzman & Sophie Meunier, 2023. "Naïve no more: Foreign direct investment screening in the European Union," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S3), pages 40-53, July.
    8. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski, 2017. "What Type of Power has the EU Exercised in the Ukraine–Russia Crisis? A Framework of Analysis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 3-19, January.
    9. Bart-Jaap Verbeek, 2022. "Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 110-120.
    10. Andreu Casero-Ripollés & Jorge Tuñón & Luis Bouza-García, 2023. "The European approach to online disinformation: geopolitical and regulatory dissonance," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Zenobia T. Chan & Sophie Meunier, 2022. "Behind the screen: Understanding national support for a foreign investment screening mechanism in the European Union," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 513-541, July.
    12. Luuk Schmitz & Timo Seidl, 2023. "As Open as Possible, as Autonomous as Necessary: Understanding the Rise of Open Strategic Autonomy in EU Trade Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 834-852, May.
    13. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Mitchell A. Orenstein & R. Daniel Kelemen, 2017. "Trojan Horses in EU Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 87-102, January.
    14. L. Johan Eliasson & Patricia Garcia‐Duran, 2023. "New is old? The EU's Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S3), pages 9-18, July.
    15. María J. García, 2023. "Implementation of EU Trade Agreements Under an Assertive, Open, and Sustainable Trade Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 212-222.
    16. Eugénia C. Heldt, 2023. "Europe’s Global Gateway: A New Instrument of Geopolitics," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 223-234.
    17. Shawn Donnelly, 2023. "Semiconductor and ICT Industrial Policy in the US and EU: Geopolitical Threat Responses," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 129-139.
    18. Antonio Calcara & Arlo Poletti, 2023. "Varieties of Anti‐Globalism: The Italian Government’s Evolving Stance on the EU’s Investment Screening Mechanism," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 177-187.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:61:y:2023:i:4:p:970-987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.