IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v49y2011i1p23-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Realism and the Common Security and Defence Policy

Author

Listed:
  • STEN RYNNING

Abstract

The European Union has ventured into the business of power politics with its common security and defence policy (CSDP). Realism can explain both why the EU is being pulled into this business and why it is failing to be powerful. Although realism has much to offer, it is not the dominant approach to the study of the EU and its foreign affairs because the EU is commonly perceived as capable of transcending power politics as we used to know it. The first purpose of this article is therefore to question the stereotyping of realism as a framework that only applies to great power confrontations. The second is to introduce the complexity of realist thought because realism is a house divided. The analysis first examines structural realism, then the classical realist tradition. The third and final purpose of the article is to evaluate the contributions these approaches can make to the study of the CSDP. The most powerful realist interpretation of the CSDP is found to be the classical one, according to which the CSDP is partly a response to international power trends but notably also the institutionalization of the weakness of European nation-states. The article defines this perspective in relation to contending realist and constructivist perspectives. It highlights classical realism as a dynamic framework of interpretation that does not provide an image of a CSDP end‐state, but rather a framework for understanding an evolving reality and for speaking truth to power.

Suggested Citation

  • Sten Rynning, 2011. "Realism and the Common Security and Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 23-42, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:49:y:2011:i:1:p:23-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02127.x
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:397-416 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Monoson, S. Sara & Loriaux, Michael, 1998. "The Illusion of Power and the Disruption of Moral Norms: Thucydides' Critique of Periclean Policy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 92(2), pages 285-297, June.
    3. Zachary Selden, 2010. "Power is Always in Fashion: State‐Centric Realism and the European Security and Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 397-416, March.
    4. Jolyon Howorth, 2001. "European Defence and the Changing Politics of the European Union: Hanging Together or Hanging Separately?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 765-789, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magnus Ekengren & Simon Hollis, 2020. "Explaining the European Union's Security Role in Practice," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 616-635, May.
    2. Đukanović Dragan, 2015. "The Process of Institutionalization of the EU’s CFSP in the Western Balkan Countries during the Ukraine Crisis," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 21(72), pages 81-106, February.
    3. Flynn Brendan, 2016. "The EU’s Maritime Security Strategy: a Neo-Medieval Perspective on the Limits of Soft Security?," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 22(75), pages 9-37, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harald Schoen, 2008. "Identity, Instrumental Self-Interest and Institutional Evaluations," European Union Politics, , vol. 9(1), pages 5-29, March.
    2. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:453-481 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Anand Menon, 2011. "Power, Institutions and the CSDP: The Promise of Institutionalist Theory," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 83-100, January.
    4. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:397-416 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Foucart, Renaud & Wan, Cheng, 2018. "Strategic decentralization and the provision of global public goods," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 537-558.
    6. Claes H. De Vreese & Anna Kandyla, 2009. "News Framing and Public Support for a Common Foreign and Security Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 453-481, June.
    7. Zachary Selden, 2010. "Power is Always in Fashion: State‐Centric Realism and the European Security and Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 397-416, March.
    8. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2003. "Problem-solving effectiveness and democratic accountability in the EU," MPIfG Working Paper 03/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    9. Leonce Röth, 2022. "After Merkel – The 2021 German Election and its Implications for European Union Politics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(S1), pages 48-59, September.
    10. Davide Angelucci & Pierangelo Isernia, 2020. "Politicization and security policy: Parties, voters and the European Common Security and Defense Policy," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(1), pages 64-86, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:49:y:2011:i:1:p:23-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.