IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v39y2001i4p765-789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European Defence and the Changing Politics of the European Union: Hanging Together or Hanging Separately?

Author

Listed:
  • Jolyon Howorth

Abstract

This article assesses the implications of the common European security and defence policy (CESDP) for shifts in both the politics and the policy‐making procedures of the European Union. It analyses the emerging dynamics of the new institutional structures of CESDP launched in 2000 (COPS, EUMC, EUMS, HR‐CFSP) and in particular the tensions between national capitals and the process of ‘Brusselization’ in the definition and formulation of European foreign and security policy. It argues that, in the field of crisis management, the requirements of rapid decision‐making and efficient implementation will increasingly favour Brussels as the locus of policy formulation. This process will be enhanced by the growing role in CESDP of military officials and of defence ministries, which will take primary responsibility for the shape and remit of the nascent European Rapid Reaction Force (ERRF). The article also assesses the problems facing EU governments in selling CESDP to their publics. This involves the construction of a discourse which, both cognitively and normatively, can persuade electorates coming from very different security cultures of the necessity and appropriateness of the project. It also requires governments, sooner or later, to make the case for increased defence spending.

Suggested Citation

  • Jolyon Howorth, 2001. "European Defence and the Changing Politics of the European Union: Hanging Together or Hanging Separately?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 765-789, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:39:y:2001:i:4:p:765-789
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00330
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-5965.00330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Foucart, Renaud & Wan, Cheng, 2018. "Strategic decentralization and the provision of global public goods," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 537-558.
    2. Harald Schoen, 2008. "Identity, Instrumental Self-Interest and Institutional Evaluations," European Union Politics, , vol. 9(1), pages 5-29, March.
    3. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:397-416 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2003. "Problem-solving effectiveness and democratic accountability in the EU," MPIfG Working Paper 03/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    5. Claes H. De Vreese & Anna Kandyla, 2009. "News Framing and Public Support for a Common Foreign and Security Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 453-481, June.
    6. Zachary Selden, 2010. "Power is Always in Fashion: State‐Centric Realism and the European Security and Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 397-416, March.
    7. Davide Angelucci & Pierangelo Isernia, 2020. "Politicization and security policy: Parties, voters and the European Common Security and Defense Policy," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(1), pages 64-86, March.
    8. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:453-481 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Leonce Röth, 2022. "After Merkel – The 2021 German Election and its Implications for European Union Politics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(S1), pages 48-59, September.
    10. Sten Rynning, 2011. "Realism and the Common Security and Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 23-42, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:39:y:2001:i:4:p:765-789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.