IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v38y2000i2p303-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy‐making in Nested Institutions: Explaining the Conservation Failure of the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Dexter C. Payne

Abstract

The widely recognized conservation failure of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) is largely due to the nested institutional context in which fishermen’s issues are negotiated. Divergent Member State interests regarding the competence of Community institutions have led to the selection and maintenance of ineffective policies. I propose a three‐level game to draw out the implications of policy‐making within nested institutions. To substantiate this explanation, I show how the guiding principles of the CFP have created and heightened Prisoner’s Dilemma game incentives among both Member States and fishermen, yet have been retained due to divergent Member State interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Dexter C. Payne, 2000. "Policy‐making in Nested Institutions: Explaining the Conservation Failure of the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 303-324, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:38:y:2000:i:2:p:303-324
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00221
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-5965.00221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hubert Zimmermann, 2019. "The European Parliament and the Layered Politicization of the External Dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 237-247.
    2. Lukas Schweiger, 2010. "The Evolution of the Common Fisheries Policy: Governance of a Common-Pool Resource in the Context of European Integration," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 7, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    3. Fabio Franchino, 2005. "Forum Section The Study of EU Public Policy," European Union Politics, , vol. 6(2), pages 243-252, June.
    4. Doris Fuchs, 2017. "Windows of Opportunity for Whom? Commissioners, Access, and the Balance of Interest in European Environmental Governance," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Rouba Al-Fattal, 2009. "The Tragedy of the Commons: Institutions and Fisheries Management at the Local and EU Levels," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 537-547.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:38:y:2000:i:2:p:303-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.