IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v47y2020i7-8p821-857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Have SFAS 166 and SFAS 167 improved the financial reporting for securitizations?

Author

Listed:
  • Minkwan Ahn
  • Samuel B. Bonsall
  • Zahn Bozanic
  • Yiwei Dou
  • Gordon Richardson
  • Dushyantkumar Vyas

Abstract

Critics have alleged that securitization accounting prior to 2010 was among the causes of the recent financial crisis. In response to this criticism, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) implemented two new accounting standards, SFAS 166 and SFAS 167, to improve the financial reporting for securitizations. Bank regulators have stated their belief that SFAS 166/167 will result in a consolidated balance sheet (and risk‐based capital ratios based thereupon) that better reflects a bank's exposure to risk related to securitized assets. We document that, by ceding retained power or influence through the servicing/special servicing functions to third parties, SFAS 166/167 resulted in real effects to the extent that banks (particularly those that were weakly capitalized) achieved their accounting objectives in the post‐SFAS 166/167 period through legitimate transaction structuring in line with the intent of the new rules. Further, we use capital market participants’ assessments of risk retention by sponsoring banks as a benchmark, and provide evidence consistent with bank regulators’ beliefs. In particular, following SFAS 166/167, equity investors of sponsoring banks do not consider (consider) as risk relevant securitized assets that receive off‐balance sheet (on‐balance sheet) treatment. Securitized assets that are consolidated under SFAS 166/167 exhibit the same risk relevance as assets that are not securitized, despite contractual provisions that would seem to imply substantial risk transfer.

Suggested Citation

  • Minkwan Ahn & Samuel B. Bonsall & Zahn Bozanic & Yiwei Dou & Gordon Richardson & Dushyantkumar Vyas, 2020. "Have SFAS 166 and SFAS 167 improved the financial reporting for securitizations?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7-8), pages 821-857, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:47:y:2020:i:7-8:p:821-857
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12449
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.12449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nemit Shroff, 2017. "Corporate investment and changes in GAAP," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-63, March.
    2. Gary B. Gorton & Nicholas S. Souleles, 2007. "Special Purpose Vehicles and Securitization," NBER Chapters, in: The Risks of Financial Institutions, pages 549-597, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Qiuhong Zhao, 2019. "Interaction between securitization gains and abnormal loan loss provisions: Credit risk retention and fair value accounting," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(7-8), pages 813-842, July.
    4. Uhde, André & Michalak, Tobias C., 2010. "Securitization and systematic risk in European banking: Empirical evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 3061-3077, December.
    5. Michalak, Tobias C. & Uhde, André, 2012. "Credit risk securitization and bank soundness in Europe," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 272-285.
    6. G. Andrew Karolyi, 2009. "Discussion of A Lobbying Approach to Evaluating the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 585-595, May.
    7. Ting Luo & Terry Warfield & Peter Clarkson, 2014. "The implementation effects of expanded consolidation: the case of consolidating special purpose entities," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 54(2), pages 539-566, June.
    8. Yiwei Dou & Stephen G. Ryan & Biqin Xie, 2018. "The Real Effects of FAS 166/167 on Banks’ Mortgage Approval and Sale Decisions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 843-882, June.
    9. Miguel A. Segoviano & Bradley Jones & Peter Lindner & Johannes Blankenheim, 2013. "Securitization: Lessons Learned and the Road Ahead," IMF Working Papers 2013/255, International Monetary Fund.
    10. Daniel A. Bens & Steven J. Monahan, 2008. "Altering Investment Decisions to Manage Financial Reporting Outcomes: Asset‐Backed Commercial Paper Conduits and FIN 46," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5), pages 1017-1055, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minkwan Ahn, 2023. "The Market’s View on Accounting Classifications for Asset Securitizations," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Mendonça, Helder Ferreira & Barcelos, Vívian Íris, 2015. "Securitization and credit risk: Empirical evidence from an emerging economy," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 12-28.
    2. Battaglia, Francesca & Buchanan, Bonnie G. & Fiordelisi, Franco & Ricci, Ornella, 2021. "Securitization and crash risk: Evidence from large European banks," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Marques, Manuel O. & Pinto, João M., 2020. "A comparative analysis of ex ante credit spreads: Structured finance versus straight debt finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. Vivian Íris Barcelos & Helder Ferreira De Mendonça, 2016. "Securitization And Credit Risk In The Brazilian Economy," Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 115, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    5. Beccalli, Elena & Boitani, Andrea & Di Giuliantonio, Sonia, 2015. "Leverage pro-cyclicality and securitization in US banking," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 200-230.
    6. Carlos Arteta & Mark Carey & Ricardo Correa & Jason Kotter, 2020. "Revenge of the Steamroller: ABCP as a Window on Risk Choices," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 24(3), pages 497-528.
    7. van der Plaat, Mark T., 2021. "How to Measure Securitization: A Structural Equation Approach," MPRA Paper 109735, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. López-Penabad, Mª Celia & López-Andión, Carmen & Iglesias-Casal, Ana & Maside-Sanfiz, Jose Manuel, 2015. "Securitization in Spain and the wealth effect for shareholders," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 308-323.
    9. Nourzad, Farrokh & Hunter, William & Szczesniak, Katherine, 2020. "Securitization of revolving debt and its determinants," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 240-246.
    10. Sugata Roychowdhury & Suraj Srinivasan, 2019. "The Role of Gatekeepers in Capital Markets," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 295-322, May.
    11. Bernier, Maxence & Plouffe, Michael, 2019. "Financial innovation, economic growth, and the consequences of macroprudential policies," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 162-173.
    12. Nicodano, Giovanna & Regis, Luca, 2019. "A trade-off theory of ownership and capital structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(3), pages 715-735.
    13. Denise A. Jones, 2013. "Changes in the Funded Status of Retirement Plans after the Adoption of SFAS No. 158: Economic Improvement or Balance Sheet Management," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1099-1132, September.
    14. Kyle D. Allen & Drew B. Winters, 2021. "Auditor response to changing risk: money market funds during the financial crisis," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1057-1086, April.
    15. Jeremy Michels, 2017. "Disclosure Versus Recognition: Inferences from Subsequent Events," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 3-34, March.
    16. Maarten van Oordt, 2017. "Credit Risk Transfer and Bank Insolvency Risk," Staff Working Papers 17-59, Bank of Canada.
    17. Tobias Witter & Thorsten Sellhorn & Jens Müller & Vicky Kiosse, 2022. "Balance sheet smoothing," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0006, Berlin School of Economics.
    18. Lu, Meng-Jou & Chen, Cathy Yi-Hsuan & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl, 2015. "Copula-based factor model for credit risk analysis," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2015-042, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    19. Vink, Dennis, 2007. "An Empirical Analysis of Asset-Backed Securitization," MPRA Paper 10382, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Aug 2008.
    20. Farruggio, Christian & Michalak, Tobias C. & Uhde, Andre, 2013. "The light and dark side of TARP," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 2586-2604.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:47:y:2020:i:7-8:p:821-857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.