IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v45y1994i1p12-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between Recall and Precision

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Buckland
  • Fredric Gey

Abstract

Empirical studies of retrieval performance have shown a tendency for Precision to decline as Recall increases. This article examines the nature of the relationship between Precision and Recall. The relationships between Recall and the number of documents retrieved, between Precision and the number of documents retrieved, and between Precision and Recall are described in the context of different assumptions about retrieval performance. It is demonstrated that a tradeoff between Recall and Precision is unavoidable whenever retrieval performance is consistently better than retrieval at random. More generally, for the Precision–Recall trade‐off to be avoided as the total number of documents retrieved increases, retrieval performance must be equal to or better than overall retrieval performance up to that point. Examination of the mathematical relationship between Precision and Recall shows that a quadratic Recall curve can resemble empirical Recall–Precision behavior if transformed into a tangent parabola. With very large databases and/or systems with limited retrieval capabilities there can be advantages to retrieval in two stages: Initial retrieval emphasizing high Recall, followed by more detailed searching of the initially retrieved set, can be used to improve both Recall and Precision simultaneously. Even so, a tradeoff between Precision and Recall remains. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Buckland & Fredric Gey, 1994. "The relationship between Recall and Precision," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 45(1), pages 12-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:45:y:1994:i:1:p:12-19
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:13.0.CO;2-L
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:13.0.CO;2-L
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:13.0.CO;2-L?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ngoc Uyen Phuong Nguyen & Martin G. Moehrle, 2019. "Technological Drivers of Urban Innovation: A T-DNA Analysis Based on US Patent Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Madhusudanan Navinchandran & Michael E. Sharp & Michael P. Brundage & Thurston B. Sexton, 2022. "Discovering critical KPI factors from natural language in maintenance work orders," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 1859-1877, August.
    3. Sanjay K. Arora & Alan L. Porter & Jan Youtie & Philip Shapira, 2013. "Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(1), pages 351-370, April.
    4. Matteo Manca & Ludovico Boratto & Salvatore Carta, 0. "Behavioral data mining to produce novel and serendipitous friend recommendations in a social bookmarking system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    5. Izaskun Alvarez-Meaza & Enara Zarrabeitia-Bilbao & Rosa Maria Rio-Belver & Gaizka Garechana-Anacabe, 2020. "Fuel-Cell Electric Vehicles: Plotting a Scientific and Technological Knowledge Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Yueyong Wang & Xuebing Gao & Yu Sun & Yuanyuan Liu & Libin Wang & Mengqi Liu, 2024. "Sh-DeepLabv3+: An Improved Semantic Segmentation Lightweight Network for Corn Straw Cover Form Plot Classification," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Zhang, Fan & Bales, Chris & Fleyeh, Hasan, 2021. "Night setback identification of district heat substations using bidirectional long short term memory with attention mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    8. Fei Zhu & Quan Liu & Yuchen Fu & Bairong Shen, 2014. "Segmentation of Neuronal Structures Using SARSA (λ)-Based Boundary Amendment with Reinforced Gradient-Descent Curve Shape Fitting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Suner Aslı, 2019. "Clustering methods for single-cell RNA-sequencing expression data: performance evaluation with varying sample sizes and cell compositions," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Martin Wieland & Juan Gorraiz, 2020. "The rivalry between Bernini and Borromini from a scientometric perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1643-1663, November.
    11. Matteo Manca & Ludovico Boratto & Salvatore Carta, 2018. "Behavioral data mining to produce novel and serendipitous friend recommendations in a social bookmarking system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 825-839, August.
    12. Zhang, Yan & Zhu, Degang & Wang, Menglin & Li, Junhan & Zhang, Jie, 2024. "A comparative study of cyber security intrusion detection in healthcare systems," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    13. Parraguez, Pedro & Škec, Stanko & e Carmo, Duarte Oliveira & Maier, Anja, 2020. "Quantifying technological change as a combinatorial process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Matthew J. Jacobson, 2022. "Archaeological Evidence for Community Resilience and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Quantitative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Zeqing Yang & Mingxuan Zhang & Yingshu Chen & Ning Hu & Lingxiao Gao & Libing Liu & Enxu Ping & Jung Il Song, 2024. "Surface defect detection method for air rudder based on positive samples," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 95-113, January.
    16. Chris Davis & Graham Aid, 2022. "Machine learning‐assisted industrial symbiosis: Testing the ability of word vectors to estimate similarity for material substitutions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 27-43, February.
    17. Bremer, Lucas & Heitmann, Mark & Schreiner, Thomas F., 2017. "When and how to infer heuristic consideration set rules of consumers," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 516-535.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:45:y:1994:i:1:p:12-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.