IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v43y1992i3p249-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International comparison of departments' research performance in the humanities

Author

Listed:
  • A. J. Nederhof
  • E. C. M. Noyons

Abstract

Methods are developed to compare the research performance of departments in two humanities disciplines, general linguistics and general literature. Departments from an Anglo‐Saxon country were compared with several departments from European, non‐Anglo‐Saxon countries. A method was developed to reconstruct publication lists of departments, based on searches in various databases. We were able to retrieve 98% of the citations given to the work of one particular department. In both disciplines, it was found that the impact of some departments was largely dependent on their books and chapters, while other departments received most citations from their journal articles. The origins of citations were traced. Some departments had a largely local impact, whereas others showed a more cosmopolitan impact. Although there was some evidence of continental “self‐citations,” citations were also given across continents. The results indicate that bibliometric assessment of research performance is potentially useful in these humanities disciplines. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • A. J. Nederhof & E. C. M. Noyons, 1992. "International comparison of departments' research performance in the humanities," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 43(3), pages 249-256, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:43:y:1992:i:3:p:249-256
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199204)43:33.0.CO;2-I
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199204)43:33.0.CO;2-I
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199204)43:33.0.CO;2-I?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anthony J. Nederhof & Marc Luwel & Henk F. Moed, 2001. "Assessing the quality of scholarly journals in Linguistics:An alternative to citation-based journal impact factors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 51(1), pages 241-265, April.
    2. Beril T. Arik & Engin Arik, 2017. "“Second Language Writing” Publications in Web of Science: A Bibliometric Analysis," Publications, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Mu-Hsuan Huang & Han-Wen Chang & Dar-Zen Chen, 2006. "Research evaluation of research-oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993 to 2003," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 67(3), pages 419-435, June.
    4. Daniela Filippo & Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent & Elías Sanz-Casado, 2020. "Toward a classification of Spanish scholarly journals in social sciences and humanities considering their impact and visibility," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1709-1732, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:43:y:1992:i:3:p:249-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.