IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v21y1970i5p351-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standards for writing abstracts

Author

Listed:
  • Ben H. Weil

Abstract

An abstract, as defined here, is an abbreviated, accurate representation of a document. The following recommendations are made for the guidance of authors and editors, so that abstracts in primary documents may be both helpful to their readers and reproducible with little or no change in secondary publications and services. Prepare an abstract for every formal item in journals and proceedings, and for each separately published report, pamphlet, thesis, monograph, and patent. Place the abstract as early as possible in the document. Make the abstract as informative as the document will permit, so that readers may decide whether they need to read the entire document. State the purpose, methods, results, and conclusions presented in the document, either in that order or with initial emphasis on findings. Make each abstract self‐contained but concise; retain the basic information and tone of the original document. Keep abstracts of most papers to fewer than 250 words, abstracts of reports and theses to fewer than 500 words (preferably on one page), and abstracts of short communications to fewer than 100 words. Write most abstracts in a single paragraph. Normally employ complete, connected sentences; active verbs; and the third person. Employ standard nomenclature, or define unfamiliar terms, abbreviations, and symbols the first time they occur in the abstract. When authors' abstracts are employed in secondary services, precede or follow each abstract with the complete bibliographic citation of the document described. Include pertinent information about the document itself (type, number of citations, etc.) if this is necessary to complete the message of the abstract.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben H. Weil, 1970. "Standards for writing abstracts," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 21(5), pages 351-357, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:21:y:1970:i:5:p:351-357
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630210507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630210507
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.4630210507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nhu Le Quynh Nguy & Hung Tan Ha, 2022. "Lexical Profile of Academic Written English Revisited: What Does it Take to Understand Scholarly Abstracts?," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    2. Tan Jin & Huiqiong Duan & Xiaofei Lu & Jing Ni & Kai Guo, 2021. "Do research articles with more readable abstracts receive higher online attention? Evidence from Science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8471-8490, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:21:y:1970:i:5:p:351-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.