IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v92y2024i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the Reciprocal of a Binomial Proportion

Author

Listed:
  • Jiajin Wei
  • Ping He
  • Tiejun Tong

Abstract

The binomial proportion is a classic parameter with many applications and has also been extensively studied in the literature. By contrast, the reciprocal of the binomial proportion, or the inverse proportion, is often overlooked, even though it also plays an important role in various fields. To estimate the inverse proportion, the maximum likelihood method fails to yield a valid estimate when there is no successful event in the Bernoulli trials. To overcome this zero‐event problem, several methods have been introduced in the previous literature. Yet to the best of our knowledge, there is little work on a theoretical comparison of the existing estimators. In this paper, we first review some commonly used estimators for the inverse proportion, study their asymptotic properties, and then develop a new estimator that aims to eliminate the estimation bias. We further conduct Monte Carlo simulations to compare the finite sample performance of the existing and new estimators, and also apply them to handle the zero‐event problem in a meta‐analysis of COVID‐19 data for assessing the relative risks of physical distancing on the infection of coronavirus.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiajin Wei & Ping He & Tiejun Tong, 2024. "Estimating the Reciprocal of a Binomial Proportion," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 92(1), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:92:y:2024:i:1:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.1111/insr.12539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12539
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/insr.12539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tong, Tiejun & Wang, Yuedong, 2007. "Optimal Shrinkage Estimation of Variances With Applications to Microarray Data Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 113-122, March.
    2. repec:bla:jorssa:v:163:y:2000:i:3:p:381-402 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Rickey E. Carter & Yan Lin & Stuart R. Lipsitz & Robert G. Newcombe & Kathie L. Hermayer, 2010. "Relative risk estimated from the ratio of two median unbiased estimates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(4), pages 657-671, August.
    4. Frank Tuyl & Richard Gerlach & Kerrie Mengersen, 2009. "The Rule of Three, its Variants and Extensions," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 77(2), pages 266-275, August.
    5. J. L. Hutton, 2000. "Number needed to treat: properties and problems," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 163(3), pages 381-402.
    6. Lorenzo Fattorini, 2006. "Applying the Horvitz-Thompson criterion in complex designs: A computer-intensive perspective for estimating inclusion probabilities," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(2), pages 269-278, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomasz Bąk, 2021. "Spatial sampling methods modified by model use," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(2), pages 143-154, June.
    2. Lorenzo Fattorini & Timothy G. Gregoire & Sara Trentini, 2018. "The Use of Calibration Weighting for Variance Estimation Under Systematic Sampling: Applications to Forest Cover Assessment," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(3), pages 358-373, September.
    3. Bing-Yi Jing & Zhouping Li & Guangming Pan & Wang Zhou, 2016. "On SURE-Type Double Shrinkage Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1696-1704, October.
    4. Tae-Hwan Kim & Christophe Muller, 2020. "Inconsistency transmission and variance reduction in two-stage quantile regression," Post-Print hal-02084505, HAL.
    5. Zongliang Hu & Zhishui Hu & Kai Dong & Tiejun Tong & Yuedong Wang, 2021. "A shrinkage approach to joint estimation of multiple covariance matrices," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 339-374, April.
    6. J. T. Gene Hwang & Jing Qiu & Zhigen Zhao, 2009. "Empirical Bayes confidence intervals shrinking both means and variances," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(1), pages 265-285, January.
    7. L.-C. Zhang & M. Patone, 2017. "Graph sampling," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 75(3), pages 277-299, December.
    8. Dong, Kai & Pang, Herbert & Tong, Tiejun & Genton, Marc G., 2016. "Shrinkage-based diagonal Hotelling’s tests for high-dimensional small sample size data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 127-142.
    9. Sara Franceschi & Rosa Maria Di Biase & Agnese Marcelli & Lorenzo Fattorini, 2022. "Some Empirical Results on Nearest-Neighbour Pseudo-populations for Resampling from Spatial Populations," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Herbert Pang & Tiejun Tong & Hongyu Zhao, 2009. "Shrinkage-based Diagonal Discriminant Analysis and Its Applications in High-Dimensional Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1021-1029, December.
    11. Yeil Kwon & Zhigen Zhao, 2023. "On F-modelling-based empirical Bayes estimation of variances," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 110(1), pages 69-81.
    12. Dazard, Jean-Eudes & Sunil Rao, J., 2012. "Joint adaptive mean–variance regularization and variance stabilization of high dimensional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 2317-2333.
    13. Haoge Chang, 2023. "Design-based Estimation Theory for Complex Experiments," Papers 2311.06891, arXiv.org.
    14. Ganesh Karapakula, 2023. "Stable Probability Weighting: Large-Sample and Finite-Sample Estimation and Inference Methods for Heterogeneous Causal Effects of Multivalued Treatments Under Limited Overlap," Papers 2301.05703, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    15. Grafström Anton & Matei Alina, 2015. "Coordination of Conditional Poisson Samples," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(4), pages 649-672, December.
    16. Lorenzo Fattorini, 2009. "An adaptive algorithm for estimating inclusion probabilities and performing the Horvitz–Thompson criterion in complex designs," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 623-639, December.
    17. Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen & Dorte Gyrd‐Hansen, 2004. "Cost‐effectiveness analysis based on the number‐needed‐to‐treat: common sense or non‐sense?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(1), pages 9-19, January.
    18. Ronny Kuhnert & Dankmar Böhning, 2005. "The failure of meta-analytic asymptotics for the seemingly efficient estimator of the common risk difference," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 541-554, October.
    19. Frank Tuyl, 2017. "A Note on Priors for the Multinomial Model," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(4), pages 298-301, October.
    20. Paul H. Garthwaite & John R. Crawford, 2011. "Inference for a binomial proportion in the presence of ties," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(9), pages 1915-1934, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:92:y:2024:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.