IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/intlab/v154y2015i4p497-518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Falling female labour force participation in Kerala: Empirical evidence of discouragement?

Author

Listed:
  • Shalina Susan MATHEW

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Shalina Susan MATHEW, 2015. "Falling female labour force participation in Kerala: Empirical evidence of discouragement?," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 154(4), pages 497-518, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:intlab:v:154:y:2015:i:4:p:497-518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ilr.2015.154.issue-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jannet Farida Jacob, 2018. "Higher Education in India from 1983 to 2014: Participation, Access and Labour Market Outcomes across Socio-religious Groups," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 12(1), pages 74-92, April.
    2. Ruchi Bhalla & Surendra Meher, 2019. "Education, Employment and Economic Growth with Special Reference to Females in Kerala," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 62(4), pages 639-658, December.
    3. PV Viswanath, 2018. "Microfinance and the Decision to Invest in Children’s Education," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Usami, Yoshifumi & Patra, Subhajit & Kapoor, Abhinav, 2018. "Measuring Female Work Participation in Rural India: What Do the Primary and Secondary Data Show?," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 8(2), December.
    5. Shalina Susan MATHEW, 2024. "Working, yet not working: Assessing labour underutilization in India," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 163(1), pages 141-162, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:intlab:v:154:y:2015:i:4:p:497-518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilounch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.