IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indres/v64y2025i1p103-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An employee–employer relationship gone bad? Examining the double‐edged effect of psychological contract violation on employees' helping behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Adom Asante
  • Michael Asiedu Gyensare
  • Laila El Bouzidi
  • Evelyn Twumasi

Abstract

An important concept that depicts the nature of employee–employer relationship is the psychological contract. Prior research has argued that all forms of extra‐role behaviors suffer once employees' psychological contracts are violated. Helping behaviors are a specific form of extra‐role behaviors that may suffer due to psychological contract violation. We argue that this predominantly negative relationship between psychological contract violation and helping behaviors is because the literature has not adequately examined the different types of helping behaviors. Using the latent moderated structural equation approach with multiwave and multisource data from a survey of 269 full‐time employees and their coworkers from the hospitality industry in Ghana, we show that psychological contract violation is positively related to reactive helping behaviors and negatively associated with anticipatory helping behaviors through anticipatory anxiety.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Adom Asante & Michael Asiedu Gyensare & Laila El Bouzidi & Evelyn Twumasi, 2025. "An employee–employer relationship gone bad? Examining the double‐edged effect of psychological contract violation on employees' helping behaviors," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 103-124, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:indres:v:64:y:2025:i:1:p:103-124
    DOI: 10.1111/irel.12358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12358
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irel.12358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indres:v:64:y:2025:i:1:p:103-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8676 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.