IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v42y2018i6p1030-1047.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Problem Spaces’ and Struggles Over the Right to the City: Challenges of Living Differentially in a Gentrifying Istanbul Neighborhood

Author

Listed:
  • Özlem Öz
  • Mine Eder

Abstract

Focusing on everyday life and the dynamics of contestations between very different groups thrown together in dangerous proximity in a neighborhood of Istanbul called Tophane, this article contributes to debates on urban transformation, political aspects of gentrification and the right to the city, with a focus on how to live differentially. Amidst rising political tensions and polarization in Turkey, competing economic interests, gentrification pressures and/or ultimate clashes over norms and values have fueled these contestations, which have degenerated into violent encounters. Calling for a re‐evaluation of ‘the right to the city’, we argue that, unless the concept of right to the city is complemented by a commitment to live differentially—that is, by a right to difference—mediating and addressing these contestations will be difficult. Whether clashes over the right to the city and everyday encounters can lead to a new politics committed to resisting urban transformation that pushes the boundaries of urban citizenship, or whether these uncomfortable encounters will continue to escalate, with one group claiming hegemony over space until the neighborhood is finally and fully gentrified, remains very uncertain. But it will, ultimately, be the litmus test of the country's democracy and inclusive citizenship.

Suggested Citation

  • Özlem Öz & Mine Eder, 2018. "‘Problem Spaces’ and Struggles Over the Right to the City: Challenges of Living Differentially in a Gentrifying Istanbul Neighborhood," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1030-1047, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:42:y:2018:i:6:p:1030-1047
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12656
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.12656?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zühal Özbay Daş & Gülşah Özşahin, 2021. "An empirical analysis of gentrification in Istanbul," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 501-526, June.
    2. D. Asher Ghertner, 2020. "Lively Lands: The Spatial Reproduction Squeeze and the Failure of the Urban Imaginary," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 561-581, July.
    3. Sinan Tankut Gülhan, 2022. "Neoliberalism and neo-dirigisme in action: The state–corporate alliance and the great housing rush of the 2000s in Istanbul, Turkey," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 1443-1458, May.
    4. Charalampos Tsavdaroglou, 2020. "The Refugees’ Right to the Center of the City and Spatial Justice: Gentrification vs Commoning Practices in Tarlabaşı-Istanbul," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 230-240.
    5. Charalampos Tsavdaroglou, 2020. "The Refugees’ Right to the Center of the City and Spatial Justice: Gentrification vs Commoning Practices in Tarlabaşı-Istanbul," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 230-240.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:42:y:2018:i:6:p:1030-1047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.