IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v22y1998i1p9-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metropolitan government and governance in western countries: a critical review

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Lefèvre

Abstract

The failure of top‐down imposed institutional reform for metropolitan areas in the western world has called for new conceptions of institution‐building. A bottom up, governance type approach is now considered in various countries which focuses on flexible, voluntary and partnership elements of collective action through which institution is no longer considered as a ready‐made object but as a process. A large part of the literature insists upon the effectiveness of this approach through the search for consensus and highlights its internal elements as conditions of success. However, this conception forgets the political and ideological dimensions of institution‐building and, consequently, the likely conflicts and obstacles unresolved by governance. This article discusses the relationships between metropolitan government and governance taking a few western urban areas as examples and questions the apparent success of the ongoing metropolitan experiences. L’échec des réformes institutionnelles imposées d’en haut dans les régions métropolitaines du monde occidental appelle une nouvelle conception de la formation des institutions. Une approche de type gouvernement, par le bas, centrée sur les éléments d’action collective flexibles, volontaires et en association, dans laquelle l’institution n’est plus considérée comme un objet tout fait mais comme un processus est maintenant envisagée dans certains pays. Une grande partie de la littérature insiste sur l’efficacité de cette approche par une recherche du consensus et souligne que les éléments internes sont la clef du succès. Néanmoins, cette théorie oublie les dimensions politiques et idéologiques de la formation des institutions et, conséquemment, les conflits probables et les difficultés non résolues par le gouvernement. Prenant quelques régions urbaines comme exemples, cet essai discute des relations entre gouvernement métropolitain et gouvernance et questionne le succès apparent des expériences métropolitaines en cours.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Lefèvre, 1998. "Metropolitan government and governance in western countries: a critical review," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 9-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:22:y:1998:i:1:p:9-25
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.00120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. N.A. Phelps & N. Parsons, 2003. "Edge Urban Geographies: Notes from the Margins of Europe's Capital Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 1725-1749, August.
    2. Slack, Enid, 2007. "Managing the coordination of service delivery in metropolitan cities : the role of metropolitan governance," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4317, The World Bank.
    3. Lackowska Marta & Norris Donald F., 2017. "Metropolitan governance (or not!) in Poland and the United States," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 21(3), pages 114-123, September.
    4. Alejandro Lara & Felipe Bucci & Cristobal Palma & Juan Munizaga & Victor Montre-Águila, 2021. "Development, urban planning and political decisions. A triad that built territories at risk," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(2), pages 1935-1957, November.
    5. Katherine M Johnson, 2006. "Sovereigns and Subjects: A Geopolitical History of Metropolitan Reform in the USA," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(1), pages 149-168, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:22:y:1998:i:1:p:9-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.